Tennessee Lawmaker Wants to Issue "Death Certificates" for Abortions

Feb 14, 2007 21:12

Oh sweet Jesus.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Legislation introduced in Tennessee would require death certificates for aborted fetuses, which likely would create public records identifying women who have abortions ( Read more... )

reproductive freedom

Leave a comment

Comments 12

abbylee February 15 2007, 02:42:39 UTC
Does anyone know how the medical system works? Are there already systems in place for tracking how many abortions are performed? Not survey type statistics, but actual record keeping requirements. What about for other surgeries and medical procedures?

This particular idea is stupid. But I'm curious as to the actual mechanics of the reality.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

thisficklemob February 15 2007, 04:45:56 UTC
Oh yeah! This reminds me of that guy who wanted to pass a law requiring miscarriages be reported to the sheriff within 48 hours with "products of conception" to be turned over.

And since maybe a third of all pregnancies end in miscarriage before the woman even knows she's pregnant, that basically would have amounted to shipping your monthly flow to the sheriff if you were having sex with a man.

And technically, since conception simply means sperm fertilizing egg, and not necessarily implantation, who knows what other fluids. :p

These people are cuh-razy. And most of them appear to have failed (or never taken) Health.

Reply

voyageofbeagle February 15 2007, 06:34:49 UTC
Yes, since this is all moving in the direction of issuing death certificates for the possibility of a baby, let's start issuing them each time a woman uses birth control. Or gets her period.

Reply

txvoodoo February 15 2007, 05:14:45 UTC
There are people lobbying for that.

Also see this: http://www.missfoundation.org/news/legislation.html

Reply


fishsanwitt February 15 2007, 05:50:47 UTC
God, doesn't he have anything better to do than harass women?

Reply


boisestudley February 16 2007, 08:43:14 UTC
I hate that wasteful b.s. kind of legislative effort. One of the reasons I so longer work for the section 527 that used to be my employers is that in the name of promoting LGBT rights through candidate endorsement, they selectively "didn't notice" that one of the candidates they endorsed supported enactment of the exact same b.s. legislation you described. Did I mention that supporting pro-choice candidate, in addition to LGBT friendly candidates, is part of their mission statement? And that it was an organization co-founded by none other than Ellen Malcolm? That is all.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up