I received the same article in my Inbox twice last week, so maybe some of you (in the States) have also seen it. It was an article written my a person who feels strongly that people should have to pass a "Civics" test to be allowed to vote. (The test is under the cut at the end of the entry
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
There would be fewer people who vote, but 100% of them would have some idea of how their votes would affect other parts of their life. I'm tired of people who vote for one thing that intrinsically suggests a change in something else, then their is an outcry that something else changed as a result. -_-
Reply
But any such test should not be trivial. Passing the test above does not really prove that you know much about the government; it proves that you have a love of politics. That's one issue.
My other problem is that it elevates the responsibility of citizens beyond what the Founding Fathers ever intended. Our job as citizens was to elect a responsible and intelligent Electoral College, not to pick a president. The Electoral college might need to pass that test, but not a common citizen.
Reply
Reply
Reply
12. Used to be elected by state governments.
15. Never rememeber names, but is he Nevada?
21. Based on the members of Congress from that state, therefore a minimum of 3. Wikipedia notes that DC also gets to vote for President, receiving the minimum number.
26. And 3/4 of the states.
(verification of my points provided by wikipedia)
Reply
Then again, I'm sure my husband would have gotten each one right and then some, but he has a minor in Political Science. He's got a bit of an advantage over this chemist. ;)
Yes, Harry Reid is from Nevada.
Reply
But what the heck, I'll just supply the original language of the Voting Act of 1965, which states that there will be a "nationwide prohibition against the denial or abridgment of the right to vote on the basis of literacy tests." The Supreme Court expanded this understanding to ANY type of testing to vote.
Huh. Lookee there. Stop showing YOUR civic history ignorance by sending out crappy emails.
Reply
very interesting history, by the way; thanks
Reply
Reply
3. I, too, am in favor of limited suffrage, and I think you nailed the best way of doing that -- paying taxes.
2 & 1. I think my analogy was based mostly on the trivial questions about people's names and such.
Reply
Leave a comment