Leave a comment

Comments 52

drunkenlullaby May 29 2003, 23:28:41 UTC
yay. i feel elite

Reply

lbcboy232 May 29 2003, 23:31:29 UTC


damn skippy.

Reply

xxprettyhatexx May 30 2003, 12:20:17 UTC
rAwr!!!!>:o

Reply


twoisacrowd May 29 2003, 23:43:33 UTC
is it one or two?

Reply

lbcboy232 May 30 2003, 08:42:21 UTC


number two.

you didn't comment, yo.

didn't think you wanted to be kept on :D

Reply

twoisacrowd May 30 2003, 11:05:35 UTC
oh but i do!

Reply

lbcboy232 May 30 2003, 11:26:36 UTC


i figured you did.

so i added you back.

(like, whoa!)

Reply


sexychicken May 30 2003, 00:36:53 UTC
pls add me back! I am really busy & don't have much time to comment, but I'd like to keep in touch... :)

Reply

lbcboy232 May 30 2003, 08:43:34 UTC


no problem.

i was hoping you'd want to be added back.

i mean, c'mon we're 92% compatible ;)

anyway, you're back

Reply


I just assumed... revaladdinsane May 30 2003, 03:19:27 UTC
... you weren't gonna remove me. Especially since you dropped my name 4 times in one week. add me back or I WILL replace you with the monkey!

Reply

Re: I just assumed... lbcboy232 May 30 2003, 08:46:35 UTC


i took you off just to get you pissed.

i would have ended up putting you back on, just because you finally started writing more in your journal.

i was just curious if you'd comment :D

you're back.

Reply


well aren't we mighty self-involved? obscured May 30 2003, 04:40:03 UTC
it's a friggin livejournal, man. chill. when all is said and done, does it really matter who comments or reads? it's all in the name of narcissism anyway.

Reply

Re: well aren't we mighty self-involved? lbcboy232 May 30 2003, 08:48:28 UTC


the whole idea behind this was to let people get out of reading my journal without any hard feelings.

i (had) seventy people on my friends list. needed to clear it out a bit, and this was the best way to do it.

and yes, it's still all in the name of narcissism.

i'm not as "deep" as you are, so i wasn't sure if you wanted to stay on.

but i'll consider this your comment.

so you're back.

Reply

Re: well aren't we mighty self-involved? obscured May 30 2003, 14:23:38 UTC
depth has absolutely nothing to do with it. put all the quotation marks around it that you want, but it's true.

it's just the whole idea of making people ask to be a part of something that is already incredibly public and self-aware. it shouldn't matter if you have 5 or 500 on your friends list, or if you get 1 or 1000 comments. keep me on, take me off, it's all the same, it's all your decision, it shouldn't affect your writing.

::shrug::

Reply

Re: well aren't we mighty self-involved? lbcboy232 May 30 2003, 16:41:17 UTC


of course i want you on.

but what i'm trying to say is that no matter who is on my friends list, it won't affect my writing. but i do feel like i'm neglecting to read friends' journal entries when i have fourty to read everyday.

this way i think it out, and i can pay more attention to people like you :D

Reply


Leave a comment

Up