'Big-Box' ordinance puts new Target on hold By Gary Washburn
Tribune staff reporter
Published August 3, 2006, 9:59 AM CDT
[My commentary is in brackets.]A Target store planned for a long-vacant South Side site remains in limbo today as the retailer awaits the fate of the city's "big-box" minimum wage ordinance
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
I think what would have been better is if there was an overall city minimum wage of $10. You think the Unions would be scrabbling for such a wage. If he does not veto, I do not see such a law passing constitutional muster for the very reason it only targets SOME companies.
Reply
Reply
in Santa Barbara, Walmart is not allowed; they've just basically put their foot down on Super Marts. but then again, the city council here has such a tight control that they have designated a building code for downtown that states all new building MUST follow the spanish mission style so that they 'blend in' properly.
the exception to the marts is the one Kmart out in Goleta (suburb/sistercity). well, and the Costco. but neither are huge.
So the physically big stores are out, but for some reason, all of the Vons, Albertsons and Starbucks are okay...
all about image here.
Reply
Reply
Of course another side effect of min. wage increase instead of increase in product cost, is a cut in personel. Less people to pay this new wage. Hey sweet more money for one person in a low skill job, puts another person out of that same job. Hmm economic law still works. Apparently you can't legislate a good economy.
Reply
Please track down everyone in goverment and staple gun this to their faces.
Reply
Leave a comment