I did not go looking for
this, but I stumbled upon it whilst noodling around elsewhere. Yet another reason why religious nuts should not be allowed to dictate what goes on in any woman's womb.
Since not many folks read me, I will allow comments unless they get trollish and abusive. And I have a very short fuse.
Comments 10
But keep your damned hands and values OFF MY BODY.
/off soapbox, but keeping the damned thing close, just in case/
Reply
There are certain times when abortion is needed. There are times when it is wanted. There is a diff between those. A woman should have the right to choose.
Those women who use abortion as a birth control...I find that wrong. There are myriad ways of preventing conception. Use them. Same for men.
Gov't and such should not have the right to tell women what to do about their bodies. It's their body, and sometimes drastic measures such as abortion must be considered. It's the woman, and man if she has one, who should decide.
Meh...
Reply
Before Roe v. Wade, my mother had an abortion because of her age and circumstances that would not support a child emotionally. She had to jump through hoops you would not believe. Three psychiatrists had to confirm she would be actively suicidal if she had to carry the child to term.
My folks tried to shield me from this, but I was persistant in finding out why my mother nearly died on the operating table. No, it was not a bad job, her body just could not take the stress that the procedure put on it. Carrying to term would have been much worse for her, let alone the family.
Yes, I do support informed choice. Not allowing a choice is, to me, the bigger sin because that makes free will (which is touted by the Abrahamic religions) a sham.
Reply
I hope she takes the State of Nebraska and the hospital to court for the unnecessary suffering their interpretation of the law caused her daughter.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Unfortunately, those who want to have absolute control set the fighting arena in the religious sector and it was allowed to stay there by those who think they might benefit. So those of us who know that it is about control are hampered by what is perceived.
I am, and have been, very lucky to know men such as you and sordak and a few others who do not see their masculinity in jeopardy if they support everyone's right to have control over their own lives and choices.
Reply
I agree with the previous commentator. I am Pro-Choice, not Pro-Abortion. Using abortion for birth control is stupid. I actually have an acquaintence who the only reason she's around is because her mother couldn't afford an abortion and she was told this by her mother. But people are going to be stupid and I'd rather have it legal and done in a safe and sterile enviroment so maybe when the mother stops being an idiot(long shot there) she still might be able to have children.
But having abortion available for rape victims, incest victims and those women who need them to save the life of the mother, that I do believe in.
Reply
This kind of child abuse is one reason I do not like those who are militantly anti-birth control. Yes, birth control is a preferred method, but birth control can fail.
Some states (Utah comes to mind) are proposing laws that will make even spontanious miscarriages suspect. So a woman (never a man) will be subjected to a police review if she miscarries for any reason. Men who slap their wives around and cause a miscarriage will be exonerated with the old saw that "she made him beat her up until she miscarried".
I really want to go live on Rhodenitia. It is more my brand of crazy.
Reply
Leave a comment