You CAN'T just blame NC

Jun 02, 2012 16:39

The geniuses from NC:

Crack that wrist! Give 'em a good punch!
He now says that suggesting to punch your kid isn't child abuse, btw. “You know, it’s amazing how ‘punch’ has been equated to inciting violence against gay youth."

Yeah, it's amazing, numbnuts, how we might get that confused.

And this guy: Round 'em up! Let's put gay people in death Read more... )

rl, queer

Leave a comment

Comments 14

kermit_thefrog June 2 2012, 23:06:52 UTC
.....*Weary headdesk*

I can't even work up rage right now. Unless the increasing desire to round up all these fuckers and douse them in radioactive waste and make them live in an isolated part of the nearest DESERT counts as rage.

Reply

ladydreamer June 3 2012, 00:12:08 UTC
The whole thing unnerves me.

Breathe!

Reply


mimiheart June 2 2012, 23:41:28 UTC
This gay couple in my lovely state are not only being terrorized, but the police say it's their fault.

At least DOMA is going away, hopefully?

I'm in the process of slamming my head against a wall in a religious debate that doesn't even involve gay people... although it's with a wackaloon who was defending one of those preachers before. She doesn't understand why I won't defend this one preacher who was convicted of child abuse for hitting two-month-olds with wooden dowels with the diameter the same as a quarter based on "spare the rod" verse from the Bible. (The babies were grumpy and emotional and crying.)

She claims it's a first amendment issue.

Fuck that shit. First amendment ends at someone else's body. Actually, that goes for all of this.

Reply

ladydreamer June 3 2012, 00:11:06 UTC
Just no. Not even close to okay. I don't know how anyone can defend abuse like that. Not for children who can hit back, and especially not for BABIES. At that point you know that rationality has taken a flying leap out of the window. I'm sure Jesus was all about beating some babies.

Re: Arizona
Fuck you Arizona. UGH.

Reply

mimiheart June 3 2012, 00:23:10 UTC
Arizona, where I'm pregnant because I'm a menstruating woman. I don't even... apparently you're pregnant before you GET pregnant here. It's Schrodinger's Uterus. The woman exists in a state where she is both pregnant and not pregnant until the time when she is observed either pregnant or not pregnant. I love it when the legislature declares these things.

I don't know how anyone could defend beating an infant with a stick. Saying a 4000 y.o. book said to! Yeah, that's logical. (It's not even a good interpretation of the 4000 y.o. book. Talmud says that if you must strike a child to do so only with a shoelace. I'm pretty sure they're not talking about whipping them, either.)

Reply

ladydreamer June 3 2012, 00:34:14 UTC
I legit lolled at Schroinger's Uterus. Then I had visions of the pregnant/not pregnant dilemma from Dr. Who. We're all Flesh.

It makes no sense to defend that case. I mean, if you really want the 'first amendment' to have any meaning when you defend the right of preachers to incite violence, it's probably best not to give defense to baby beaters. It's just fucking ridiculous.

Reply


firebunny June 3 2012, 03:10:28 UTC
And not to let the South and Midwest have all the fun, from Oakland, MD My flesh kind of likes the idea of killing off all the gays. But uh... it's wrong? (weird)

My flesh kind of likes the idea of Tom Welling and by that I mean the thought of Tom Welling turns me on sexually.

I feel like this guy just admitted that the thought of killing people gives him wood. How did everyone in the congregation not get completely creeped out?

Reply

ladydreamer June 3 2012, 03:17:54 UTC
I think that's exactly what he's saying, and his congregation feels the same way.

Reply

firebunny June 3 2012, 03:27:08 UTC
I guess they don't have to be creeped out since I'm creeped out enough for all of them.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up