I can't even work up rage right now. Unless the increasing desire to round up all these fuckers and douse them in radioactive waste and make them live in an isolated part of the nearest DESERT counts as rage.
I'm in the process of slamming my head against a wall in a religious debate that doesn't even involve gay people... although it's with a wackaloon who was defending one of those preachers before. She doesn't understand why I won't defend this one preacher who was convicted of child abuse for hitting two-month-olds with wooden dowels with the diameter the same as a quarter based on "spare the rod" verse from the Bible. (The babies were grumpy and emotional and crying.)
She claims it's a first amendment issue.
Fuck that shit. First amendment ends at someone else's body. Actually, that goes for all of this.
Just no. Not even close to okay. I don't know how anyone can defend abuse like that. Not for children who can hit back, and especially not for BABIES. At that point you know that rationality has taken a flying leap out of the window. I'm sure Jesus was all about beating some babies.
Arizona, where I'm pregnant because I'm a menstruating woman. I don't even... apparently you're pregnant before you GET pregnant here. It's Schrodinger's Uterus. The woman exists in a state where she is both pregnant and not pregnant until the time when she is observed either pregnant or not pregnant. I love it when the legislature declares these things.
I don't know how anyone could defend beating an infant with a stick. Saying a 4000 y.o. book said to! Yeah, that's logical. (It's not even a good interpretation of the 4000 y.o. book. Talmud says that if you must strike a child to do so only with a shoelace. I'm pretty sure they're not talking about whipping them, either.)
I legit lolled at Schroinger's Uterus. Then I had visions of the pregnant/not pregnant dilemma from Dr. Who. We're all Flesh.
It makes no sense to defend that case. I mean, if you really want the 'first amendment' to have any meaning when you defend the right of preachers to incite violence, it's probably best not to give defense to baby beaters. It's just fucking ridiculous.
And not to let the South and Midwest have all the fun, from Oakland, MD My flesh kind of likes the idea of killing off all the gays. But uh... it's wrong? (weird)
My flesh kind of likes the idea of Tom Welling and by that I mean the thought of Tom Welling turns me on sexually.
I feel like this guy just admitted that the thought of killing people gives him wood. How did everyone in the congregation not get completely creeped out?
Comments 14
I can't even work up rage right now. Unless the increasing desire to round up all these fuckers and douse them in radioactive waste and make them live in an isolated part of the nearest DESERT counts as rage.
Reply
Breathe!
Reply
At least DOMA is going away, hopefully?
I'm in the process of slamming my head against a wall in a religious debate that doesn't even involve gay people... although it's with a wackaloon who was defending one of those preachers before. She doesn't understand why I won't defend this one preacher who was convicted of child abuse for hitting two-month-olds with wooden dowels with the diameter the same as a quarter based on "spare the rod" verse from the Bible. (The babies were grumpy and emotional and crying.)
She claims it's a first amendment issue.
Fuck that shit. First amendment ends at someone else's body. Actually, that goes for all of this.
Reply
Re: Arizona
Fuck you Arizona. UGH.
Reply
I don't know how anyone could defend beating an infant with a stick. Saying a 4000 y.o. book said to! Yeah, that's logical. (It's not even a good interpretation of the 4000 y.o. book. Talmud says that if you must strike a child to do so only with a shoelace. I'm pretty sure they're not talking about whipping them, either.)
Reply
It makes no sense to defend that case. I mean, if you really want the 'first amendment' to have any meaning when you defend the right of preachers to incite violence, it's probably best not to give defense to baby beaters. It's just fucking ridiculous.
Reply
My flesh kind of likes the idea of Tom Welling and by that I mean the thought of Tom Welling turns me on sexually.
I feel like this guy just admitted that the thought of killing people gives him wood. How did everyone in the congregation not get completely creeped out?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment