Leave a comment

Comments 1555

freakish_ct January 19 2011, 23:54:19 UTC
please be true please be true please be true...

Reply


momoda6 January 19 2011, 23:54:44 UTC
...what?

By 'covershot', are we talking like a photoshoot of Darren and Chris, or like a paparazzi 'look who we spotted getting friendly on set!' kind of thing? *not american, not sure what kind of magazine this is*

Because if it's like a photoshoot, then that's kind of weird, seeing as they're not a couple on the show yet, and if it were just a general Glee shoot, it's weird to only have Blaine and Kurt present.

Unless it's gonna be some thing on gay teen characters, idk. Look at me looking a gift horse in the mouth and demanding some reasoning behind this.

Reply

devonwood January 19 2011, 23:56:13 UTC
They're more like photoshoots, not paparazzi shots. It's not a gossip magazine.

Reply

momoda6 January 20 2011, 00:02:14 UTC
Then, yeah, I'm kind of curious to see why they're on the cover. I mean, if it were advertising the return of glee, idk why they'd show the dalton characters, especially as they're supposedly not in the superbowl episode much.

That aside, OMG AFTER ALL THIS WAITING FOR A DARREN/CHRIS PHOTO, WE GET A WHOLE FRICKIN SHOOT?!

Reply

drinkingstars January 19 2011, 23:59:31 UTC
Our entertainment magazine are on a weird "early" cycle here. So the March issue of something comes out in February. So they often are breaking or forecasting stories that will actually be developing in the next 3 to 4 weeks. It's kind of strange, I know. But EW is the magazine that would do this, if anyone was going to get a "scoop" on the hot new couple to watch, etc. It's a very legit magazine and has a great relationship with Glee. :)

Reply


lilymay008 January 19 2011, 23:54:53 UTC
OMG. Please be true.

Reply


goodnightsong January 19 2011, 23:55:20 UTC

... )

Reply

planetariium January 20 2011, 00:00:55 UTC
Nobody says it better than Colbert ;)

Reply

larosh713 January 20 2011, 00:59:07 UTC
Agree. :)

Reply


ancuru January 19 2011, 23:55:36 UTC

... )

Reply

starrynights110 January 19 2011, 23:57:46 UTC
Totally necessary. Was just going to ask someone to post that. :D

Reply

shaolina January 20 2011, 00:02:28 UTC
This gif has never been more relevant. XD

Reply


Leave a comment

Up