Now, it must be said that shooting gigs at Slimelight/Electrowerkz is probably a hobby for a masochist. The light is f-ing awful; three people in the venue make it look crowded and the whole place is covered with a layer of grime that would make the inside of my car engine look like a sterile environment
(
Read more... )
Comments 20
Reply
Alas, you're in LA...
Maybe when you're rich and famous you can fly me over; or the next time I'm passing on holiday!
Reply
I'd like to see people if time permits.
Reply
Reply
*this explitive may not appear in the dictionary.
Reply
And yes, still up for Jan. Can you check with the organiser they're not going to get anal about me taking photos. Who is it anyway?
Reply
Reply
What's the best way of talking this through some more? Do you know the other bands? Can you make an initial contact with Sahra on my behalf?
I should be able to get a little press coverage out of it for you too.
Reply
I know that you didn't like the venue for shooting in, but this lot came out well given what you've said about it.
Reply
In terms of processing I switched (as you can tell) between exaggerated colour to counter the flash and oh-god-can-I-save-this-in-mono.
There's a little something there as you say, but not much.
Reply
Secondly, given our usual tardy work-rate, and rare busy-ness live this year, I was a bit confused as to how we "move on" in one year! Two new songs since our last UK gig not enough? Greedy!
:-)
Reply
The "moving on comment" was based on my impressions of having seen you three times in 2006 (making you one of the bands I've seen most this year!). While I enjoyed what you did and of course Steve had an immediate connection with the Slimelight crowd (but also some nerves?) I didn't feel that there was a noticeable "improvement" compared to earlier gigs.
Obviously I can't speak for before this year (as I'd never seen RBN before 2006) whereas I've seen some bands come on in leaps and bounds I felt you've kinda plateaued. This seems to happen to many artists and they need to "break" out of this to get to the next level - that could probably be crudely categorised as the leap from "support" to "headline". It's not trivial and to be blunt there's a huge number of acts who never make it.
At least that's my impression! I expect you'd find others that will disagree - but I just hope that makes some sense. And of course best of luck for 2007!!!
Reply
Yep, there's always that "where do we go from here" worry, and I said to someone afterwards that we weren't a headline band yet, altho we could, as support, make the difference between a good gig and a better one... That said, in the UK there's not a great deal of choice of appropriate bands.
We're still getting into our stride I think; the Covenant date in May were our first for 2 years, and we only played once in 2004. As constructive criticism is no bad thing, was it songs or general performance that gave you that impression?
Reply
It was a general impression - next time I'll try and think more constructively at the time! (if you let me in that is!!!). It is probably fair to say I see so many gigs, large and small, that I'm quite hard to impress.
Also, it probably must be said that having your "best known song" being a remix doesn't do you any favours. You need the next floorpacker to be the "album version" so to speak.
Finally I didn't realise you'd gigged so little - I assumed I was a latecomer to your music. If I was looking at you as "a new band in 2006" (which sounds like a reasonably fair interpretation) I'd be more impressed and less critical about "not being a headline yet".
Reply
Leave a comment