I just love being completely overlooked (ergo screwed over) as a user, because they want to emulate a format more in synchronicity with your typical social networking/'following' hubub, and I want something conductive to, oh I dunno, actual ARCHIVING.
Who are they targeting with this?
I could bitch about the deletion of the bundling system alone, but this entire overhaul (uh, or underhaul I think is more accurate) is beyond useless to those of us who have anything approaching a complex tagging system, or have a particularly large list of links/bookmarks. (So we know comm archives like the kink meme or kirkspock are officially screwed.)
This new 'stacking' mode, or whatever the hell the has: tag is supposed to actually accomplish, is not an acceptable replacement. The majority of my own tags have been lost, mangled, or are just plain non-functioning, not to mention the structure of my link descriptions has been fucked to hell
( ... )
THIS. This was EXACTLY my reaction when I first loaded the site this afternoon. UGH. SO glad I'm not alone. If they don't rollback, I'm pretty sure they're going to get a HUGE drop in users... Send them a letter, complain away, say everything you just did and more because they screwed up BAD and someone should be fired.
Who are they targeting with this?
I could bitch about the deletion of the bundling system alone, but this entire overhaul (uh, or underhaul I think is more accurate) is beyond useless to those of us who have anything approaching a complex tagging system, or have a particularly large list of links/bookmarks. (So we know comm archives like the kink meme or kirkspock are officially screwed.)
This new 'stacking' mode, or whatever the hell the has: tag is supposed to actually accomplish, is not an acceptable replacement. The majority of my own tags have been lost, mangled, or are just plain non-functioning, not to mention the structure of my link descriptions has been fucked to hell ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment