Am I remembering this correctly?

Dec 08, 2011 08:26

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to camp out in your park, strew trash all over, and forcibly block the local farmers' market.

blahblahblah, doing it wrong, politics

Leave a comment

Comments 69

firstfrost December 8 2011, 14:46:38 UTC
Congress shall apparently also make no law abridging the right of corporations to air unlimited numbers of false attack ads. Sometimes freedom of speech includes mess and garbage.

Reply


dcltdw December 8 2011, 15:42:13 UTC
Because, of course, blocking the local farmers' market is the most pressing issue of our times!!

Reply

kirisutogomen December 8 2011, 15:49:37 UTC
Sorry, I forgot to inform you, but I changed my policy and now actually pay attention to issues other than genocide.

Reply


arcanology December 8 2011, 17:30:23 UTC
Assemble, of course, means only to come together in groups of white property owning males for coffee and light speechifying, including the consumption of one (1) alcoholic drink of no more than 70 proof.

Reply

kirisutogomen December 8 2011, 18:07:09 UTC
Also, "religion" refers to a flavor of sorbet, and "speech" means a postage stamp commemorating the discovery of Hotson's Brush-tailed Mouse.

At some point the sarcasm gets so thick that communication grinds to a complete stop and they might as well put us on CNN along with the rest of the shouting nitwits.

Reply

arcanology December 8 2011, 19:00:58 UTC
I was just trying to fit with the theme of the post.

The nonsarcastic version is: messy free speech is a lot better than a populous that lies around whining quietly in their rooms like bloated seals on a beach.

Nonsarcastic but still filled with weird metaphor. I can't quit that.

Reply

kirisutogomen December 8 2011, 20:17:32 UTC
Your point would be relevant if we were being offered the dichotomous choice between the two options you suggest. As it is, it's an instructive example of a false dilemma.

And I do sincerely appreciate weird metaphor and would never ask you to stop.

Reply


psychohist December 8 2011, 23:28:31 UTC
Is there something that actually happened that you're objecting to here?

Reply

kirisutogomen December 9 2011, 03:57:09 UTC
Yeah, I don't like that anyone took seriously the argument that a crime isn't really a crime if you're saying something vaguely political while you commit it. Sure, they lost in court, but it should never have got to court. The assertion that the First Amendment gives you the right to camp out on my lawn and sell Vicodin to passersby should have been taken as seriously as the assertion that Sun Yat-sen was actually a hippopotamus in a very clever disguise.

Reply

psychohist December 9 2011, 18:22:48 UTC
Er, most criminals get to court.

Still, thanks for the post; nice to know someone else (bakedweasels) has some understanding of the real situation (I already knew you did).

Note that I actually agree with some of the underlying points of the Occupy Wall Street protesters - albeit not those firstfrost quotes about Occupy Boston, which I agree simply represent greed - but I'll save that for another discussion.

Reply

kirisutogomen December 11 2011, 17:48:11 UTC
Most criminals get to court, but they get there by claiming that they didn't commit the armed robbery, not by claiming that armed robbery isn't a crime if you do it during the course of an act of political speech.

Reply


firstfrost December 9 2011, 00:46:17 UTC
Also, assuming you're talking about Occupy Boston and not something like Occupy Framingham that I don't know details about, the Dewey Square farmer's market has lost customers but is not forcibly blocked, if this is true.

Reply

kirisutogomen December 9 2011, 03:59:57 UTC
OK, I stand corrected. I got that detail wrong. Occupy Boston is in fact even more impotent than I had believed, and has only managed to partially screw up the farmer's market. Thank you.

Reply

kirisutogomen December 11 2011, 17:41:54 UTC
OK, I think I may have gotten a bit carried away with verbal gymnastics there. Sorry ( ... )

Reply

firstfrost December 11 2011, 17:54:03 UTC
Ah, okay, I can parse your initial complaint that way when I look at it again. I read it much more as "OB sucks because they are intentionally doing these bad things" so the question of whether the bad things were in fact intentional, or as bad as described, seemed more relevant. Well, which you have already figured out.

I'm sorry for claiming it was trolling. :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up