So, I've been thinking about my Eragon analysis book and I think I'm going to have to change formats. Instead of doing a chapter by chapter analysis, I'm going to do something more cohesive. Making each chapter focus on a specific aspect of the book. Or books in this case. It'll let me go over both Eragon and Eldest in the same book. This will also
(
Read more... )
Comments 15
In this chapter, you will examine how flat as fuck the females are.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Maybe something like...
The Heart of Algaesia
Wherein the nature of population density, topography (the older meaning if you like), and target decoys are explored.
I realize that 'A Patchwork Land' kind of covers that a bit but... yah know, the cities themselves and the land around them should/do have some effect on the nature of the mistakes that were made? ^^;
Reply
Reply
Reply
Also - you have to stick with the "zombie horses" chapter title.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I like what you have outlined so far. The chapter titles sound pretty good so far. The more specific chapter essays is a better idea than simply going over the books by each chapter. You don't have to do that in order to reference what you need to and it's more professional looking this way, as Calliope mentioned (and less monotonous, as Nik said.) XD
I would like to ask... I have more recently started writing using mostly 'said', 'asked', 'answered', 'replied', and 'responded' in my work. Is that acceptable or should I be using those less as well? :I
I've tried emphasizing what is going on and how it is being said with what they say. If they do something, the movement is in a separate sentence or the next paragraph. I also wonder, is the ruling about using the word said in the Elements of Style? (I can't find my copy currently.)
Sorry, I've just started wondering about that lately and I figured you could answer it, seeing as your a lit major. :3
Reply
Leave a comment