Why I don't like Post-Apocalyptic dystopias - and one I do.

Jun 26, 2008 16:37

Let me clarify. As a reader, I don't care for post-apocalyptic fiction. (Disclaimer: This doesn't mean I'll never write any.) I've trying to figure out why not.

Firstly, of course, it tends to be depressing. It gets old reading about the world going to hell (or gone to hell) in the latest fashionable way. It used to be nuclear warfare; then world- ( Read more... )

ramsey shehadeh, stories, clarion 2007, strange horizons

Leave a comment

Comments 4

julieandrews June 27 2008, 02:13:23 UTC
I tend to like post-apocalyptic stories... or I like the idea of them, if not always the execution. I'm not generally into dystopias. Or utopias for that matter.

What I find most interesting about post-apocalyptic or post-disaster worlds is the building. The recreating, rebuilding, organizing. Getting people together to first survive, then remake society.

Unfortunately, most stories stop at the surviving and don't go far past that. Or they've skipped over all that and show us the world as it is now.

I've heard that British science fiction is better at rebuilding (owing to UK history after the world wars) than American science fiction. But I don't know if that's true, as I can't think of specific examples that back that up.

Reply

keyan_bowes June 27 2008, 06:04:39 UTC
I can see rebuilding would be interesting, but I always have a dark suspicion that it's going to be anti-feminist. Women needed to reproduce. The infrastructure that produced contraceptives gone. Physical strength at a premium. Etc.

Reply

julieandrews June 27 2008, 16:16:44 UTC
I love post-apocalyptic stories, but not the dystopic kind. For instance, I want to read "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy, but I hesitate because it strikes me as a very long, yet articulate, life's-a-bitch-and-then-you-die kind of story. Two of the non-dystopic types that I have really enjoyed in the past are David Brin's "The Postman" (book, not the movie), and Larry Niven/Jerry Pournelle's "Lucifer's Hammer". Both focus on the triumph of rebuilding. I don't recall any inherent anti-feminism unless you include the idea that when life gets brutal, women and children tend to be the first to get brutalized. But the points of both stories were to rise above the barbarism and restore our civilization.

Reply

keyan_bowes July 23 2008, 06:53:37 UTC
I'll look out for those books. Thanks.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up