anyone want to

[kettunainen]

a) vet this article: The Swine Flu is Not a 'Flu' at all? I did take a look at rense.com and it's more of a hoot (if that's the right word...) than whale.to. BUT I found the information presented in this article genuinely interesting. I haven't had a chance to verify anything claimed by the writer, such as whether the initial swine flu cases were

Comments

[tamago23]

From the second article: If the current H1N1 swine flu virus does become abnormally lethal, there would be three leading explanations: first, that the virus was accidentally released, or escaped, from a laboratory; second, that a disgruntled lab employee unleashed the virus (as happened, according to the official version of events, with the 2001 anthrax attack); or third, that a group, corporation or government agency intentionally released the virus in the interests of profit and power.

DUDE, THE VIRUS IS TOTALLY NOT LETHAL BECAUSE WE'RE NOT JUST COMING OUT OF A WAR AND THIS FEAR IS JUST B.S. GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA. BUT IF THE VIRUS IS LETHAL, IT'S TOTALLY THE GOVERNMENT'S FAULT FOR MAKING IT. SEE WE TOTALLY JUST COVERED OUR ASSES THERE, AND MADE IT LOOK BAD ON THE GOVERNMENT EITHER WAY. WIN/WIN!

What I'm seeing in that article are a lot of unsupported statements, such as After all, the 1918 flu virus was dead and buried - until, that is, scientists unearthed a lead coffin to obtain a biopsy of the corpse it contained. or