This morning, I had to drive S to school because she opted to stay home and finish a bit of homework she'd forgotten rather than take the bus that comes an hour before school opens. (I don't quarrel with her decision, which was sound, or with her priorities, which were to spend all last night studying for a major unit test in Spanish, and I enjoy
(
Read more... )
Comments 22
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I struggle with them sometime b/c they remind me of the "after-the-fact" dissecting of work that I don't always feel the artist consciously figures in... this more so in Art History. I'm really not convinced that all artists worked with the triangles and the "this-and-thats" that make a painting a "masterpiece"... Could they maybe just have "done it" and instinctually it was "correct"....
But you convince me in poetry it may be more of a crafting process. More like a symphony than a pop song. Much labor before the piece is a masterpiece...
So, very informative these lessons.....
and so very humbling.... I have "worked harder" on my poems since "taking your class". So, many edits and lines denoting syllables and beats...and yet I still feel like an undisciplined "rock n' roll poet" when I sit in classroom...
Thanks for this appreciation of an art...a word art!
Reply
He wanted to make it say more than the original nature poem that came to him, and he did.
Reply
Jules, 7-Imp
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The linguistics guy analyzes the use of alliteration in various lines (as pertains to stressed syllables), and also claims there are two palindromic lines (if you isolate the starting sound of the stressed syllable) in the middle, and that these devices give the poem extra weight and are one of the things that keeps the end-stopped couplets from pouncing on the reader. I found it fascinating, but decided most people's eyes would blear at reading it.
Reply
Leave a comment