An Analogy

Apr 16, 2009 01:17

If affirmative action is a band-aid over a bleeding wound, then the collateral casualties (whites and often Asians) must be the nerve cells of the healthy skin around the wound. Is it important to staunch the bleeding before healing can begin? YES ( Read more... )

race

Leave a comment

Comments 12

beteio April 16 2009, 20:11:38 UTC
I'm trying to think of what the University of California system would be in your analogy...

Reply

keilexandra April 16 2009, 20:17:18 UTC
Hah. I don't know--Prop 209 has been under attack recently. But otherwise, maybe a bruise instead of an open wound? Some might argue otherwise, given the low numbers of URMs.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

keilexandra April 17 2009, 19:47:26 UTC
Thank you for the link. I do wish it weren't so obviously biased--to the point where I question many of the claims--but it is interesting reading. However, where is the direct quote of the U.S. Dept. of Labor regarding beneficiaries of affirmative action? I also dispute the assumption that increased diversity can be solely attributed to affirmative action.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

keilexandra April 17 2009, 20:07:46 UTC
The original site was obviously biased in that it made no attempt to admit the merit of opposing arguments or acknowledge the shortcomings of affirmative action (even if only to counter them). Any such one-sided source is suspicious in my eyes.

My problem with affirmative action is not that it aids unqualified people--I very much doubt that--but that it aids less qualified people. If a woman would not have been hired over a man in a gender-blind reading--that is, assuming that both candidates were male--then the woman is relatively less qualified. I recently read a book, although dated, on admissions decisions at Stanford 10 years ago; that discussion will, I hope, be fruitful.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up