Hmm..

Mar 01, 2007 13:08

http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,23636,21307346-31037,00.html

It's kind of scary how the government is using the cost as an argument against the implementation of a far cleaner source of energy (lower emissions anyone?). The only (possibly ( Read more... )

q&a, news

Leave a comment

Comments 18

imyu March 1 2007, 16:30:53 UTC
Definitely pro, we need those weapons to finally annex our sheep loving neighbours to the south east.

Reply

imyu March 1 2007, 16:32:12 UTC
Let's not forget Antarctica, those penguins are mighty tough to take out.

Reply

imyu March 1 2007, 16:40:14 UTC
Let's not forget Hutt River Province too, try and secede from Australia eh Prince Leonard, well try and secede from one our bombs of blinding light.

Reply


squeezycow March 2 2007, 06:32:32 UTC
I'm pro, as the only reason why Australia is still using coal power energy is because for one, its cheaper, and two, theres an abundance of it.

We live in a highly capitalistic society so its only natural to pick the most profitable alternative. What we need to become is like China, except replace all coal power stations with nuclear and become the worlds largest energy source and create tesla coil towers and ion cannons. Totalitarianism FTW! MUWA HWA HA HA

j/k I'm not Red. :p

Yet...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up