(Untitled)

Oct 02, 2009 09:57

Surely it's up to a court to determine whether Roman Polanski ought to face punishment, not up to his powerful friends nor public opinion. If he deserves leniency for one reason or another, then a sentencing judge will take that into consideration.

rape and sexual assault

Leave a comment

Comments 30

karjack October 2 2009, 00:39:28 UTC
You would think so.

I am sorely disappointed in the people who have signed the petition asking for leniency, and especially Whoopi Goldberg for commenting that it 'wasn't rape-rape' whatever that means.

Reply

kateorman October 2 2009, 00:53:02 UTC
Presumably she means it wasn't forcible rape. Of course, a judge would take that into consideration when passing sentence.

Reply

karjack October 2 2009, 01:09:31 UTC
I suppose that's what she means, though it _was_ forcible rape, so I have no idea where she's getting the notion it wasn't.

Maybe it's a case of 'but I know this guy and he's not a monster' without people realizing that monsters don't commit these crimes: people do. Yes, even people we know and have worked with, who might be charismatic, talented, and just so gosh darn nice. While all of those things may be true, none of them excuse the crime.

Reply

hnpcc October 2 2009, 01:27:51 UTC
What you said. He drugged and raped a 13 year old.

Just because he makes great films and had some terrible things happen during his life doesn't change that.

Reply


lotus79 October 2 2009, 00:45:31 UTC
YES.

Reply


hnpcc October 2 2009, 05:58:34 UTC
I assume you've probably already seen this, but just in case Feministing has a round up of posts about Polanski. I particularly liked Kieran Healy's point of view.

Reply

kateorman October 2 2009, 06:11:35 UTC
No, I hadn't - thanks!

Reply


infinitarian October 2 2009, 09:56:35 UTC
Word.

Reply


pbristow October 2 2009, 13:29:43 UTC
Possibly useful counter-petition (to the Pro-Polanski petition): http://www.thepetitionsite.com/petition/599143029

Reply


Leave a comment

Up