Do bullets make this easier to read, or are they merely irksome?

Apr 05, 2009 11:41

• One in 10 young women polled by Grazia magazine have taken illicit drugs to lose weight.

• A study by the AMP and the University of Canberra cheers the closing of the wage gap for Australian women in their 20s and 30s, but lists the many reasons for the huge differences in lifetime earnings, from child-rearing to the glass ceiling. Of interest ( Read more... )

boys: john barrowman, homer sexuality, podge, feh muh nist

Leave a comment

Comments 11

Bullets hermaj April 5 2009, 05:23:37 UTC
For the elderly and infirm such as I, bullets make things much easier to read.

Reply


alawston April 5 2009, 07:15:08 UTC
One in 10 young women polled by Grazia magazine

I call stat shenanigans.

First, it says a lot more about readers of Grazia magazine than it does about young women as a species. So they're really saying that 1 in 10 of the sort of young woman who regularly reads a vapid fashion magazine takes drugs to lose weight. This is less than shocking.

Then there's also the fact that cocaine and speed have effects additional to aiding weight loss. They're lifestyle/party drugs and most of the people I know (across both genders) who take them are in it for the euphoria rather than the waistline.

Reply

kateorman April 5 2009, 07:55:31 UTC
Obviously this is a self-selected sample (so obviously I didn't point it out!). Hopefully more info will be available from the Grazia Web site tomorrow, but the news item states that the women took the drugs specifically to help them lose weight.

Reply

purrdence April 5 2009, 11:30:51 UTC
Wasn't speed used back in the early-to-mid 20th century as a diet pill?

Reply

kateorman April 5 2009, 18:47:03 UTC
Notoriously, yeah. Lots of resulting addictions.

Reply


hexacontium April 5 2009, 08:08:41 UTC
I am rather shocked by these numbers above. 15 hours on agerage cooking and cleaning *eek* I can understand that having children means more work but if you are short of time prioritizing can be so important. On average Mr.Hexa spends about 6 hours cooking and cleaning per week while I work. We eat healthy food and it's clean enough. Perfect. Lots of time to do nice things. But then we're not pretending to be housefairies. *rolleyes*

Reply

ajponder April 5 2009, 10:35:42 UTC
Be shocked. Having children is hard work, they drag dirt from one end of the house to the other, spill food, break things, dirty their clothes -- young kids can require multiple changes a day and have to be dressed, there's extra beds to air and change, $$$ are always tight so that can mean more food preparation - and cleaning up afterwards, and it also often means living in crappier houses which are more difficult to clean.
Seriously 15 hours is nothing, and yet for a single couple 6-7 hours yeah - I kindof even remember those days... and I'm seriously looking forward to them again! Prioritise ! huh!

Reply

kateorman April 5 2009, 18:51:31 UTC
Whenever I'm with parents of young kids I'm staggered by the non-stop attention the littlies require, especially once they're mobile. I'd go stark raving mad in the face of it. Any other kind of work you can take your eyes off for a few minutes without risking disaster.

Reply


peteyoung April 5 2009, 08:12:50 UTC
• 'Option' bullets are pretty small...
  • You can get prettier ones by using < li >.
  • Reply


    ajponder April 5 2009, 10:49:11 UTC
    I think mostly you don't need to bother with bullets - set out is enough - except in this case where you have two p/graphs on the same topic (the AMP/Canberra U study) - it then becomes useful as a visual aide to say the two p/graphs are linked

    Reply

    pbristow April 9 2009, 19:39:20 UTC
    Yup. This. =:o}

    Reply


    Leave a comment

    Up