Heroes (season one spoilers)

May 22, 2007 07:13


Further thoughts on Heroes, now with spoilers.
spoilers )

heroes (tv), tv

Leave a comment

Comments 18

mmcirvin May 22 2007, 12:10:15 UTC
Heroes and Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip premiered at the same time. Heroes had a weak, turgid pilot and I wanted to hate it--but there was just enough interest there to keep me watching week after week. Studio 60 had a strong pilot and I wanted to like it, but it just didn't deliver in the long run.

Heroes is still a deeply frustrating show. Some of the characters are poorly handled--the women worst of all, as you've noticed (which I suppose continues the tradition of the comics). On the other hand, the stupidest characters tend to be male (Mohinder Suresh the brilliant-yet-incredibly-stupid scientist, and Matt Parkman the telepathic cop, who seems to blunder through life entirely on impulse and can't even work his ability into an advantage most of the time ( ... )

Reply

kate_nepveu May 22 2007, 16:13:41 UTC
Thanks, that's useful. (And another vote for "Company Man," too. Obviously I need to watch at least that.)

Reply

coffeeandink May 22 2007, 18:21:06 UTC
"Company Man" is probably my favorite episode, but it reveals the backstory of a character they've been building up all season, so I don't know how strong it will be as a standalone.

Reply

filkerdave May 22 2007, 19:49:55 UTC
"Company Man" and "Five Years Gone" are both Hugo-worthy, IMHO

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

kate_nepveu May 22 2007, 16:14:12 UTC
I don't know if I like superhero comic books; I don't read them because the weight of backstory seems like an insurmountable barrier.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

kate_nepveu May 22 2007, 23:57:57 UTC
. . . which means I should care about the soon-to-be-retconned events why?

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

kate_nepveu May 22 2007, 16:16:49 UTC
Thanks--sounds like I'll give most of S1 a pass (people seem to think highly of "Company Man" & "Five Years Gone", so I may watch those individually).

And yeah, stuff really did happen, huh? The plot summaries and such at Wikipedia nearly made my eyes cross.

Reply

markerikson May 23 2007, 09:33:55 UTC
I liked that they managed to fairly aptly explain why Hiro's actions where the deciding factor in the bomb plotline. Although there were a few bits and pieces that didn't quite make sense, such as how did Bennet, Parkman and Nicki survive the explosion to be alive in "Five Years Gone"? Because unless Hiro affected their lives in some way I didn't notice, they were all doing exactly the same things they would have done in the "Five Years Gone" timeline.

Also, why didn't Claire just shoot him? Why didn't Peter say "Are you insane Nathan? She can just shoot me and nobody has to die."

Reply

kate_nepveu May 23 2007, 10:18:17 UTC
Why didn't Peter say "Are you insane Nathan? She can just shoot me and nobody has to die."

Yup, hence the Jean Grey comparison in the third _X-Men_ movie.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

kate_nepveu May 22 2007, 16:17:23 UTC
I'll probably watch at least those episodes, thanks.

Mr. Bennett is kinda freaky.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

kate_nepveu May 22 2007, 16:22:02 UTC
Thanks.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up