Freak posted this link on his Facebook, but I wanted to elaborate a little bit. I read
Sandra Tsing-Loh's piece in the Atlantic about the demise of marriage a while ago. I was annoyed, but couldn't really put my finger on it. Sort of a low-level irked. Then found
this article today that's basically a rebuttal. It's certainly funnier than Loh
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
First, a nitpick. That's not the "passive voice."
Second, there's some gender-gap issues. Loh addresses, indirectly, that's she's not in the Ozzie-and-Harriet mode, because Ozzie and Harriet were her parents. But her article doesn't give any thought to what Ozzie and Harriet's grandchildren (viz. us) are experiencing. Oversight or focus, you make the call.
Third, overall, I'm more sympathetic to Loh's view that sometimes (and perhaps for couples of a certain age) there just isn't any amount of useful work that can be done to salvage the "marriage." More importantly, I'd argue that there's no reason to demand that the narrative be about finding the point at which things could have been fixed.
Fourth, class issues up the wazoo all over these pieces. I feel like I saw that discussed somewhere, but I didn't care enough at the time to remember it.
Reply
Reply
I heard a lot of it at school, given divorce cases are a source of work for those in the numbers field.
Reply
I, too, get tired of the marriage-bashing. While, yes, there are marriages not worth saving, there are also many that can stay happy for a long period of time. Lifetimes? Maybe. Decades? Certainly.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment