"Anonymous" vs Sony
Click to view"Anonymous" is still saying that they didn't hack PSN. (Or, at least, this one particular person who made this video and is claiming to speak for "Anonymous" says so, anyway.) Yeah, I'm going to have to call BS on that.
But if, by chance, it is actually true that "Anonymous" aren't the ones that hacked PSN and it really was some sort of "outside party," then I have a challenge for "Anonymous": If you're really so concerned about an "outside party" besmirching your so-called good name, then why don't you use your prodigious skillz to sniff out and expose the assholes who did do it? Don't, however, expect me or anyone else to hold our breath while you get on that.
Of course, as I said before, I don't know how "Anonymous," by its very nature, can even have an "outside party." In other words, if anyone does anything and then attributes it to "Anonymous" (or, worse, if nobody claims credit for it at all, since that is "anonymous" by the very definition of the word), then that means it was "Anonymous" who was behind it, even if other people who feel that they belong to "Anonymous" claim otherwise. That's part of the danger of considering yourselves to be "Anonymous."