This post of Seth Godin's,
The Places You Go talks about how, very often, emotions are like rooms in our mental houses -- they are places we seek out because we want to be in that state, rather than something that happens to us.
Being a marketing philosopher, he of course connects it to brands, and mentions that the best brands figure out how to
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
Four strangers are bound together in adventure, love and occasional sorrow in this parable from Tiptree winner Valente (The Orphan's Tales). The city of Palimpsest exists somewhere outside our reality, accessible only during the sleep that follows sex. The immigrants to Palimpsest, marked forever by the tattoo-like impression of a map on their skin, seek out one another for real-world sexual adventures that function as passports to new otherworldly quarters. In outstandingly beautiful prose, Valente describes grotesque, glamorous creatures sometimes neither human nor animal, alive nor dead, and mortal travelers who pursue poignant personal quests to replace the things (and people) they've lost. Valente's fondness for digression at times makes for a difficult read, and her fable of quest and loneliness is less an engrossing fairy tale and more a meticulous travelogue of a stranger's dream.
- PW's review ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
EDIT: Ah, I see you've edited. Still, while I agree that transparent prose isn't a standard to be applied to science fiction as a whole, I personally have a strong preference for it.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Good, sure. Hard to do right? Sure. Best? Most difficult? Rarest? Horsecrap.
It's a style, and some people like it. Some people prefer realism to impressionism, and some people who love abstract expressionism think photo-realism might as well be a photograph. They're both wrong, IMNSHO, as are those who disparage "transparent prose" as BS without defining it and explaining why that particular definition is BS.
Some definitions of transparent prose are BS. Not all, but some. Just like journalists who pretend to report without bias are full of BS as well.
Take Ken Follet on the subject:
"My aim in constructing sentences is to make the sentence utterly easy to understand, writing what I call transparent prose. I've failed dreadfully if you have to read a sentence twice to figure out what it meant."
It's wrong to say ( ... )
Reply
The more I think about it, the more confused I get about what transparent prose actually means. It's got to be more than just 'pacy writing with paper-cut-out characters' or people wouldn't defend it.
Does it mean verbally stripped-down? I would expect sparse writers to think like poets too; just in a different way.
Bad writing is different from sparse because it is boring and not properly thought-out. I don't like re-reading sentences because they're gibberish syntactically, or reading paragraphs so clumped up that I can skip them without losing anything. Good writing always needs a bit of the poet weighing out the lines.
So, I am trying to straighten out my thoughts on this and I remain entirely confused.
Reply
With movies and books, you get the dissonance between people who want sequels to feel the same, and those who will whine about "well, it didn't do anything new," which annoys me. The first thing can be new, but I want subsequent entries in the same arena to have a similar flavour-- to generate the feeling I am looking for, like you say above. I cannot lie and say that I am not a slave to the flavour-- the feel I want right at the moment. I will frequently re-read chapters of a book because I can rely on it to generate / ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment