Zimbabwe is a complex subject, and the complexities have gotten a whole lot rougher on the inhabitants as time passes by. Europeans under Cecil Rhodes marched in in the ned of the 1800s and took control of the land from the local chiefs, and passed out all sorts of claims to white settlers, who set up solid and profitable ranches and farms all
(
Read more... )
Comments 20
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Denying the reality of epidemics is something of a habit for him, too--he used to be an HIV "truther".
Reply
Reply
According to a friend of mine from there, the diverse black tribes actually got together, circa the 60s, and made the decision to put aside differences for the country. Internecine warfare wasn't the problem in quite the way it was in other places, according to her.
Still, the clash of cultures between European and the several black tribes was never resolved. To the extent that one culture took over, it wasn't one that helped: Males not believing they can get AIDS, Mugabe still popular despite everyone knowing how bad he is because they support nationalism over rationality, and so on.
Reply
Zimbabwe also isn't quite as many-tribe diverse as some places. There's only two big tribes (Shona and Ndebele) in the country, and that's - oh, over 90% of the country. The latter are basically Zulus mixed with some other locals. If you don't speak English, you almost certainly speak Shona. Mugabe is Shona; I forget from which clan.
Reply
Reply
And for the record: I'm a Cohan, part of Levi, one of the two non-lost Tribes of Israel. "Tribe" is a fairly value-neutral descriptor, not (as you imply) some left-over imperialistic jargon.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Wait a minute . . . I live in Illinois . . . never mind.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment