CA Ballot Propositions: Prop 11

Oct 23, 2008 09:54

Proposition 11 is technically complicated. It attempts to take the ( Read more... )

propositions, initiatives, california

Leave a comment

Comments 13

tom_bayes October 23 2008, 17:14:27 UTC
I don't live in California and I haven't read up on this proposition, but I'm strongly in favor of anything that makes the districting process as non-partisan and logical as possible. California is particularly infamous for having virtually every district be a bizarrely shaped region that makes little geographical sense and exists only because it is "incumbent-friendly".

Reply


schmengie October 23 2008, 17:22:19 UTC
simple way to handle redistricting

term limits

Reply

jpmassar October 23 2008, 17:30:55 UTC
No, that doesn't help much. California has term limits.

Gerrymandering in CA has resulted in their being essentially
no competitive Congressional or Legislative districts.

And since relatively few people vote in the primaries which
decide the elections, the party
machines really control things to a much higher degree.

Reply

markgritter October 23 2008, 17:46:08 UTC
"The Big Sort" thesis is that even without gerrymandering, people tend to move into neighborhoods which match them--- thus leading to uncompetitive districts even if they follow 'natural' boundaries.

So while I support redistricting reform (witness Texas for what can go wrong with a legislature-driven process) I'm not convinced it will lead to more competitive races.

Reply

abostick59 October 23 2008, 17:58:39 UTC
Term limits have done their intended job: Willie Brown is no longer Speaker of the State Assembly. Now that he's gone, can we get rid of term limits? State politics is Amateur Hour as a result.

Reply


rcfox October 23 2008, 18:02:53 UTC
This is an issue where I'm in complete agreement with jpmassar. California has a completely dysfunctional legislature. And if you consider it, it's probably correct for the legislators to act in the manner in which they have. The districts are almost all gerrymandered so that only a highly partisan individual can win; there are almost no competitive districts.

This isn't a perfect proposal. Yet if this proposition passes we're likely to get something far, far better than what we currently have. Competitive races will likely lead to a legislature that can compromise and some fiscal sense in Sacramento.

For the benefit of schmengie, California already has term limits.

Reply


adb_foldem October 23 2008, 18:13:18 UTC
What happens when there is no super majority? This process seems doomed to failure except on some very esoteric level.

Reply

jpmassar October 23 2008, 18:28:44 UTC
The same thing that would happen if the Legislature / Governor
couldn't enact a redistricting plan currently?

I have no idea what would happen in that case; one might guess
a California judge would draw up new districts, since the
State Constitution presumably mandates that districts be redrawn
(or even go to Federal court -- one man, one vote)

Reply

jpmassar October 23 2008, 18:32:52 UTC
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_21

From this, it's not obvious that the Governor has any say
in the matter

Reply


tom_bayes October 23 2008, 19:06:16 UTC
Much as Oregon is (in my mind) the model for how voting should be done in this country, Iowa is the model for how apportionment and redistricting should be done.

http://www.legis.state.ia.us/Redist/Redist.html

Reply

markgritter October 23 2008, 20:21:08 UTC
And yet Iowa's 5 CDs are all tagged "safe Republican" or "safe Democratic" on DC Political Report. Although it looks like the 1st CD may be competitive this year.

(My brother is moving to Iowa. But to a pretty Republican part of Iowa, alas.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up