Re: There's no photographic evidenceanteros_lmcFebruary 6 2010, 01:06:17 UTC
First reference to the Loch Ness Monster is in Adomnan's Life of Columba, c. 690. Columba sees the monster as he travels to Inversness to attempt to convert King Bridei of the Picts. I don't think Columba managed to take a photo though ;)
Comments 18
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
And I'm afraid no one started looking for the monster until 1933.
Reply
No. That quote is taken from a scene set in modern London. I guess I'll better add a disclaimer.
Reply
Reply
And love this line: "My morals are like the Loch Ness Monster, James: sightings have been reported, but there's no photographic evidence." ;D
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment