Recently, in a thread started by
polynarch (
http://polyanarch.livejournal.com/320745.html),
deadpansev expressed the opinion that America could safely have stayed out of World War II, without fear of what a victorious Axis might have done later to America, because (quoting
deadpansev, with the spelling cleaned up):
(
Read more... )
Comments 58
Oh, you mean something like this:
( ... )
Reply
Their concept of how a resistance works comes from Hollywood, and Hollywood features clearly noble heroes of the Resistance (who scorn terror) fighting clearly evil villains of the Occupation (who are usually inept) and winning (so the issue of a wasted effort never comes up). What's more, all sacrifices are worthy and there are no long-term consequences suffered by characters who did not actually die, so upon victory civil society is resumed without impairment.It reminds me an awful lot of how, in the Star Wars Expanded Universe, the Empire rank-and-file and the Rebels get portrayed in the (better) books. In them, the Rebels aren't always especially noble (some of them are shown as having been former pirate gangs or local warlords who just didn't want to submit to Imperial authority) and the Imperials had a lot of support due to their tendency to put down raiding barbarians, slavers, and pirates who cropped up after the Clone Wars and ran amok for the next twenty years ( ... )
Reply
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Think of it as the awareness of Death, on a cultural rather than individual plane.
Reply
The United States conquered the various American Indian nations despite their best efforts at resistance. I would think the state of the reservations today would indicate what a successful invasion of the U.S. looks like.
Reply
Leave a comment