For months now, America and the world have been trying to force the small nation of Honduras to violate her own Constitution and accept back into office former President Manuel ("Mel") Zelaya, who tried to repeal term limits as part of a bid to make himself a Chavez-style President-For-Life. Zelaya not only sought foreign aid to help reverse the
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Well yes, and that was precisely the issue in Honduras. Mel Zelaya's claim to legitimacy is that he won the last election, irregardless of what he then did in violation of the Constitution of the Republic of Honduras. He was ousted by the Congress, Supreme Court and Armed Forces under Micheletti and Vasquez acting in defense of republican institutions.
The truth is that Mel Zelaya's bid for reinstatement is illegitimate on republican and democratic grounds, because Zelaya has now become extremely unpopular in Honduras owing to his demonstrated willingness to harm the nation as a whole in pursuit of his personal political agenda. The support for him is now ideologically based on the right of autocracy (from the POV of the Latin American leaders) and socialsim (from the POV of their rank and file supporters, including those in America). But autocracy from weakness is a ( ... )
Reply
Reply
And not surprised at all that the Obama administration is trying to suppress all analysis of the situation that shows they acted inappropriately.
Reply
There's still a possibility that Zelaya could win, but now it would pretty much have to be by direct invasion from the Narcoterrorist Axis, and if they tried that, even Obama might feel he had no choice but to intervene. Plus, I'm not sure that even an alliance of Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuala and Uruguay could project enough force into Honduras to take the country against military and popular resistance; most of those Latin American countries have very limited logistical support.
And not surprised at all that the Obama administration is trying to suppress all analysis of the situation that shows they acted inappropriately.
What Obama did was in the first place mind-bogglingly stupid -- he reflexively sided with our enemies, and in the process reduced America's reputation in Latin America to the point where he may well have shattered the OAS.
Reply
Reply
What was mind-bogglingly stupid was Obama acting "reflexively." About 15 minutes of research would have shown him what had actually happened. He didn't stop to listen, and then he couldn't change his position because his own stubborn pride meant more to him than Honduran lives.
I say "his own stubborn pride" rather than "American interests" or "American honor," because Obama's policy dishonored our treaty with Honduras, aided our enemies (Castro, Chavez and Ortega) and may have fatally ruptured the OAS. This has been a disaster for American foreign policy in Latin America -- and a cheaply and easily avoidable disaster, at that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment