.... but has anyone been following this controversy over this Danish newspaper that published a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad and the response it has created, in terms of boycotts of Danish goods, etc.? Things got a little more interesting today, with several European newspapers reprinting the caricatures "in solidarity" with the Danes
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
On another subject, I noticed this afternoon that the BBC article had been updated, with this:
'But late on Wednesday [France Soir's] owner, Raymond Lakah, said he had removed managing editor Jacques Lefranc "as a powerful sign of respect for the intimate beliefs and convictions of every individual".
'Mr Lakah said: "We express our regrets to the Muslim community and all people who were shocked by the publication." '
Dialectics _rarely_ allow you to predict anything with any accuracy, especially in the future, but even in the present. Following one of my favorite episodes of the Newhart Show, I like to say that they allow you to predict the past with 80% accuracy. So it's important to take credit when you call something right! In this case, what I've called "the conflict between the corporate board and the editorial board" spilled over in an extremely tangible way.
I'm feeling quite satisfied with myself. Smug, even. Ready for a beatdown.
Reply
I suspect the problem is that we may disagree on when the connection between the Marxist and the "common-sense" ideas of politics come to life. I believe it is possible short of a crisis situation; it requires a lively party life, and with it, a lively press.
For me, a template for this relationship can be found in Lenin's writings of 1906-07, when the revolutionary crisis of the year before was over, yet there were still enough remaining gains that had been ceded by the tsar that certain things were possible: a sizeable Social-Democratic Duma fraction, several daily papers associated with the party, etc. What's unfortunate about the Stalinist canonization is that, in translation, we have the contributions of one comrade to the debate, but little sense of the overall party-political life, but even from that one-sided image one gets a sense that it is possible, even necessary, to remain a consistent revolutionist while training one's attention (and more importantly, training the attention of a ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
"[This] is a very unpleasant situation for Danes, we're not used to this."
--Danish PM Anders Fogh Rasmussen
"They want to know whether Muslims are extremists or not. Death to them and to their newspapers"
--protester Mawli Abdul Qahar Abu Israra, in Afghanistan
Reply
Leave a comment