So, I've been thinking lately about our division between "rich" and "poor." "Rich" people often have very little in common, and have very different interests when it comes to what they need and expect from their country. Similarly, "poor" people fall across a wide range of political self-interest, and can be "poor" within many different societal
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
(The comment has been removed)
And I'll admit I'm not up on the Romney-esqe predators to know where they would most align.
Obviously, though, this is a draft posted for exactly this sort of public input. Thank you!
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Describing an actor like a business owner assumes he can generate income with his acting regardless of the presence of an employer. Unless someone manages to pull off a Dr. Horrible/The Guild scenario and magically generate a pile of cash, that doesn't happen.
Reply
What the actor does not generally get to do is file a 1040EZ at the end of the year claiming a standard deduction. The actor is, for all legal purposes, a self-employed person, and therefore I think that's the best place to put them.
I'm happy to be argued down on that, though. No useful classification system has clear edges, much to the dismay of the library science majors. :)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment