So then, the BFS awards shortlist has now been
published here. Which is nice. Bit of an odd mix this year and first impressions are: um, hello, can we have some more women on the shortlist sometime soon? Ta. Also, good grief, look at all that horror. Wasn't there some fantasy and SF on the long list? I'm sure there was somewhere. (Alas,
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
And yet, when it gets talked about some of the older members will cite the 80's/early 90's when all things Moorcock were all the rage and peeps were complaining that the BFS was too fantasy focused. (Before my time, that, so I can't comment there!)
Reply
When it comes to awards and setting up systems for how they get picked, I can't throw any stones until I've moved out of the greenhouse, but I did find it all a bit hassly to vote this year. I'm sure there was a long, longlist that we could nominate anything for... but I think was a secret! I just got the notice about the longlist, and, pleased that I was that some of my friends and consequently some of the things I had read and liked had made it on there, you could only choose one 'other' per category. Not much room for manoeuvre.
I've had debates with people who have argued that the drop downs help them remember what they can vote for... but I must be one of the more widely read members and I do have a clue. There were books ( ... )
Reply
Used to be you could just email all your votes/recs to the admin to get around that but I think they skipped any mention of that on the website.
Reply
Leave a comment