Nov 21, 2008 17:40
- My editor at John Wiley called and indicated that they want me (finally!) to rewrite Assembly Language Step By Step for a new edition in the spring of 2010. This will be a big job, since DOS will be jettisoned completely (and real mode relegated to a hisorical
( Read more... )
odd lots,
science,
astronomy,
books
Leave a comment
Comments 10
Reply
The trick is that the book isn't about writing useful apps or utilities in assembly so much as understanding the x86 hardware platform at the memory/machine instruction level. It's about knowing how the damned thing works, down where the software meets the silicon. There does seem to be a demand for that. If there isn't, we'll know in another year and a half.
Reply
Don't be surprised to find all the 1w carbon composition resistors are significantly above their nominal value if they are "new old stock."
I've written a bit about this at http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/carbon_composition_resistors.htm with more details in my article published in QEX March/April 2008 issue.
Jack K8ZOA
Reply
It does make me wonder about the junkbox resistors I've had following me around literally since I was 12 or so. I do test every single component before I use it to make sure the values match the markings, and every so often I spot a bad one.
The interesting thing about the resistors I bought on Monday is that they were very high values (well over 1 megohm) and will be used not as resistors but as forms for RF chokes, which was a convention in a lot of 60s-era magazine projects. The important thing was not their resistive element but that their dimensions matched those of 60s-era 1 watt carbon comp resistors. The dog-bone items (of which I have many) are right out for winding chokes on.
Reply
If only NASA did get 25% of the Federal budget...we'd probably already have Hilbert drives and extrasolar colonies by now.
Will your new assembly language book be concentrating on the Windows or Linux environment? I'd love to see a good assembly-language book using either gas or NASM syntax; the only ones I have use the old Microsoft MASM syntax...
Reply
Reply
On a complete tangent, I've been having some trouble with my e-mail. I sent you a rather long, meandering message not too long ago (in response to our conversation about characterization). Did you receive it? If not, I'll resend. I only ask because you're usually far more prompt than I about replying to e-mail. :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment