Odd? LJ habit. Why?

Jun 17, 2002 19:22

So, I understand why you would want to link (

meta

Leave a comment

Comments 7

geekosaur June 17 2002, 21:29:58 UTC
I've wondered about that myself... I tend to go for the "link on first reference" method.

Reply


thespian June 17 2002, 22:07:09 UTC
heck, I barely remember to do it the first time, which I always intend to do.

Reply


crs June 18 2002, 00:37:17 UTC
In as concise terms as possible, for consistency's sake.

Reply


roadnotes June 18 2002, 03:55:34 UTC
Consistency, I would guess. I've just remembered/figured out how to do it the first time, and probably won't keep doing it. (What can I say? I'm mean: if you want to find out whether the person I'm talking about is on LiveJournal, you can make the extra keystrokes and look for yourself.) (Or I'm lazy. Your choice.)

Reply


awfief June 18 2002, 05:34:54 UTC
I like to point out to mycroft how much I talk about him in my lj. The bold colorful references help that. :)

seriously, though, as Chris said -- consistency. Also, not everyone's username is their preferred name. The only people that call me "awfief" are my brothers, and I like to keep it that way. To the rest of the world, "awfief" is a handle, not a nickname. When it appears in plain text, without quotes around it, or without an @domain afterwards, I feel like they're calling me "awfief" which I actually quite rather hate.

I would never call my friends pheromone, hammercock, mangosteen, kb17, cthulhia, lyonesse, etc. I'd call them by their real names. So putting names like jbsegal in print like I just did, without quotes, whatever, just feels weird.

Reply

crs June 18 2002, 11:38:26 UTC
Excellent point. Either you have to assume the reader can connect "jbsegal" with that person who is later on referred to as "Bait," or you have to do something like parentheses or something... But referring to awfief or jbsegal without the surrounding it seems wrong.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up