A covenant of right relations has been proposed in my church. It's been toss around for a while now in the back ground and now it's coming forward. One of the senior members of the church commented that setting up something like this was an invitation for an abuse of this as 'rules' (quotes mine). I agree with this comment on many levels, the
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
If there's no fire, just blowing the fire extinguisher around makes things more toxic...
Reply
Reply
We already convenant to the first bit (the seven principles), it's the next bits that are making people twitchy...
It was suggested that the church 'leadership' might convanent to this sort of thing, but I am uncomfortable suggestion any division between the 'leadership' and the 'membership'; barriers to fluidity and flexibility are not what we're looking for...
Reply
The new ones.... don't really sound very realistic with regards to human behavior. Sorta Neo-Puritanism in alot of ways.
Not sure how this is really any different than The Golden Rule either.
Reply
Umm...
> To openly express opinions, but to abide by congregational decisions arrived at through the democratic process.
What are these decisions? Do they extend to controlling behavior outside the congregation site?
> To respect, support, and appreciate our staff, elected leaders, and volunteers.
This one looks odd to me, but I don't know why.
> To recognize staff and volunteer work schedules and commitments and refrain from unreasonable requests.
OTOH, this one appears fine.
The rest appear to be 'reasonable person principle'-derived, Golden Rule, natural outcroppings of the 7 principals, and related to the mission of UUA.
Reply
Leave a comment