The NY Times & Deathly Hallows

[jayfromtaiwan]

This article supposedly leaked some spoilers : http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/19/books/19potter.html

And I agree with this person that the review was no spoiler at all : Leave a comment

Comments

[azntwice]

I think the mentioning of the Hallows is a pretty big no-no, because half the book is dedicated to them.

[lumenastralis]

mm... while i agree that the author didn't give away the details, he gave away the general outline of the plot, including locations and events... that's generally considered a "no" when reviewing books ahead of release dates, isn't it?