A Few More Highlander Remake Thoughts

Jun 02, 2008 17:54

On one of the Highlander email lists, I glanced at a few emails on the subject today. There seems to be the sentiment that if only the two sequels had gotten the big budget that the remake's getting, things would have been different. And people seem quite bitter about it. But is that really true? Can you turn a sow's ear into a silk purse? If 'The ( Read more... )

highlander discussion

Leave a comment

Comments 15

amonitrate June 3 2008, 01:02:35 UTC
word.

Reply


panthology June 3 2008, 01:17:27 UTC
The thing I'm finding sad about The Source, really, is those bits of that it had potential. Maybe not for a movie, but the band of Immies Methos has with him - if it ever came about that there was a Methos TV series, Reggie, Zai and maybe Giovanni would have made an interesting group to follow. They had potential, but it got bogged down in the crappy script and the heavy-handed Dunky's-our-hero routine. ("Dear Duncan. You're a Mary-Sue. Look it up. Love, Methos.")

Which I guess is a rambly way of saying yes, good writing makes it happen, regardless of budget.

Reply


cyberducks June 3 2008, 01:23:56 UTC
I don't understand why they have to remake the only good HL movie period - it's not like the original is that old.

Oh well, the result is gonna suck anyways.

Reply


sinanju June 3 2008, 01:46:33 UTC
It remains a source of perpetual mystery to me how the same people who gave us a great television series could produce so many awful, awful movies from the same source material!

Or maybe I do. Perhaps it was the lower expectations of a weekly, low-budget tv show that made the difference. They couldn't hope to produce a blockbuster epic every week...so they didn't try. They settled for smaller, more personal stories. And that worked very well most of the time. (Though they had their fair share of stinkers even so--and the whole Ahriman storyline should have been round filed the moment it was suggested.)

Will the remake be any good? It's...possible, but signs point to no.

Reply


pat_t June 3 2008, 02:10:38 UTC
I agree with what you said. Bill Panzer had an idea of what he wanted and he wasn't listening to anyone else. He didn't want David's script, so he had someone write a script to his specifications. He got the director he wanted to shoot the scenes the way he envisioned. And it was crap!

Money wouldn't have made a difference. All shows, movies,etc start with a good script. These movies didn't have them. Which is why I'm taking a wait and see attitude. Because a big budget doesn't gaurantee a good movie either.

Reply

wh00ps June 3 2008, 02:32:19 UTC
Just a question: wasn't there a legal issue with the David script?

Reply

em_kellesvig June 3 2008, 04:00:45 UTC
Sort of. When he wrote the first script for The Source, Dimension Films still held the rights to Highlander. When those rights lapsed, they kept that script. David then wrote another, different, script. The actors signed on for The Source based on David's script. However, the one they received on set was written by someone else but still had David's name on it. No one had the heart to call him and ask what had happened to the beautiful script they had heard about and why they were filming this piece of shit. Finally, Adrian called David and they discovered that Bill Panzer had commissioned a third script, switched it with David's new one, and it was too late to do anything about it. Adrian demanded that David fly to Lithuania and spin as much of that script as possible but there really wasn't much he could do with it. Sad, very sad.

Reply

wh00ps June 3 2008, 04:23:25 UTC
Agh.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up