Yet Another (Lousy) Panem Map

Mar 06, 2013 16:55

Here's my LOLworthy 15 minute crappy computer-done job showing the locations and relative sizes of the districts I'm using for AFAF geography--I've used principally natural resource considerations in the locations, as well as the few canon clues we have. It's a rough job and the hand-drawn one would be far more precise, but this will give you an ( Read more... )

district eleven, district seven, the world of panem, the capitol, district eight, district one, district five, district twelve, district two, district thirteen, discussion, district four, district ten, district nine, district six

Leave a comment

Comments 18

jocelyncs March 6 2013, 22:03:25 UTC
For the most part, I endorse your Panem worldview more than the "official" one, though I do agree with the "official" mapmakers and aimmyarrowshigh that Florida will not exist anymore. (And I say that as a Floridian.) I like the Mexican slab in the "official" map for District 4 because its coasts would give them access to Atlantic and Pacific waters as well as the Gulf of Mexico and probably a lot of freshwater as well in the rainforest regions of the tropics.

A theory I'm running with in my novel-length fic is that District 4 includes a lot of islands formed by the former North American coastline (possibly including a few areas of former Florida).

Reply

deathmallow March 6 2013, 22:08:11 UTC
The prospective sea level rise, even for the majority of the Earth's ice caps melting, is surprisingly negligible compared to most of the US coast's elevation beyond the first few miles inland. Some of South Florida might be toast, but past Lake Okeechobee will generally be OK.

And I don't buy the "sea level rise" anyway because the warming necessary for that directly contradicts the effects of nuclear war/nuclear winter. Nuclear war seems far more likely for the implied apocalyptic scenario, famine, etc. that would have caused Panem. Suzanne Collins may not have done her scientific homework here and just tried to come up with the most apocalyptic scenario possible, even if the logic isn't sound.

So I'm basically ignoring sea level rise entirely since it's minimal and illogical.

Reply

jocelyncs March 6 2013, 22:11:59 UTC
Sea level rise isn't the only factor for this state - erosion is a major one. The sea isn't just rising, the state is sinking! We're nothing but sand, so even if the sea level doesn't go up to any major degree, most geological/geographical models indicate Florida will shrink into a sliver and eventually disappear.

Reply

deathmallow March 6 2013, 22:15:40 UTC
Sorry, forgot the numbers. You'd have to have about a 60m sea level rise to drown almost all of Florida. That would require essentially melting every scrap of ice on Antarctica. Given that Twelve still has descriptions of experiencing winter, and Two, and the Capitol, that also greatly resemble current climate in those regions, obviously global climate has not changed significantly, let alone to that degree ( ... )

Reply


angylinni March 6 2013, 23:38:25 UTC
where are you locating the district center in 1? Idaho and N Utah are pretty empty, as is N Nevada. lots of tiny towns but the only really big ones are boise on the west side and IF/Pocatello on the east. Just curious. :P

Reply

deathmallow March 6 2013, 23:48:05 UTC
Boise. Some of them may be slightly off because I was eyeballing placement after I (badly) "painted" the map.

Reply


mathgirl24 March 7 2013, 01:40:58 UTC
Works for me!

13 has always been a good number for me, so I like that I'm there. I'll take Boggs if Hazelle gets tired of him.

Reply

deathmallow March 7 2013, 01:50:06 UTC
LOL. Boggs is awesome. And if Hayzelle happened, you are more than welcome to Boggs. ;)

Reply

mathgirl24 March 7 2013, 02:23:20 UTC
YES!!!!!

Reply

deathmallow March 7 2013, 02:45:07 UTC
BOGGS! :D

Reply


marble_sharp March 7 2013, 01:57:23 UTC
Agreeing with this version a lot more than the movie's. The placement makes so much more sense, especially with D7, 12, and 13. Though I agree with jocelyncs that D4 would have territory on both coasts.

Reply

deathmallow March 7 2013, 02:05:26 UTC
Not sure the demand for fish--almost exclusively for the Capitol market--is big enough to warrant bicoastal operations, though? Port landings of catch in the Gulf of Mexico would currently be more than enough for that.

Not to mention the hassle of either maintaining a large "useless" interior space for a fisheries district to bridge between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, or else dealing with the logistics of Four being split into two discontinuous halves.

Reply


sabaceanbabe March 7 2013, 14:13:36 UTC
This map is very much in line with what I've been picturing, with the exception that I like the idea (from aimmyarrowshigh's map) of 4 extending more into the high desert of Texas. I'd also never pictured it as going all the way over to Florida, but rather extending further south along the coast of Mexico. But meh. Details, details.

I'm saving your map for future reference. :D

ETA: Look at that. The little bitch told me it couldn't post and then posted the comment anyway. *kicks LJ*

Reply

deathmallow March 7 2013, 23:52:25 UTC
*PUNTS* Will answer on your second one?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up