(Untitled)

[interstategeek]

This is what happened when I took the Select Smart Presidential Candidate Selector.

Your Results:

1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (100%) This means that my completely ideal candidate does not exist.2. Cobb, David - Green Party (92

Comments

[doobious]

Ooh, no one left a comment on this one. Maybe it's because of Rita Skeeter's disguise.

I did that poll and I think I was like 71% Bush and maybe 15% Kerry... I have some issues that I feel should be more nonpartisan than they are, but website seemed to disagree. Or maybe it's just biased.

[interstategeek]

IT IS NOT A DISGUISE! SHE IS AN ANIMAGUS! There's a difference, as I told you in the previous post, you doof.

Anyway, leave it to a conservative to think that everything is biased against his kind. Although I guess conservatives can be women, too. Even though that doesn't make much sense. I always thought that Ainsley, while being a very smart and attractive woman, was a bit of a loon.

[doobious]

Yes, she's an animagus... whatever. But the fact is, she's using it as a disguise. She's not even registered for crying out loud. She's a sleazy reporter and the fact that you're so defensive about it is revealing about your true character.

[interstategeek]

Wow. I didn't think you knew the difference. Congrats. But HOW do you know all this when you've never read Book 4, let alone any of the others? Seriously, did you google Rita Skeeter? And even then, how did you know it was her in the other post? Did you ask your roommate? Are you secretly studying the Potter storyline? Why won't you answer me?!?