(Untitled)

[insanepurin]

1977. That was before children became jaded, and actually had a childhood. Most of those kids were boys and looked to be between 7 and 10. Can you imagine a Raggedy Ann & Andy film ever being marketed to boys between 6 and 10 today? It would be reserved for toddlers and preschoolers. And Ann would have to have anime eyes with hooker make up and

Comments

[runawayblue]

Cartoonbrew is generally full of butts, so I wouldn't be surprised if that comment was homophobic. Butts.

[insanepurin]

I've learned not to trust too many animation blogs. :P That, and if you look at the toy department today, it's really not like that at all. Plus they'd be shaming children who like playing dress-up, 'cause uh... that's what kids like to do. Dress like adults, which is perfectly normal and doesn't always relate to something sexual.

[kitty_advanced]

Animation Pimp says:

I had an incident involving Raggedy Ann when I was about 4-5 years old. She haunts me to this day.

I know EXACTLY what he's talking about.

http://www.warrens.net/Annabelle.html

Annabelle is in my state and as much as I want to see her, I am FREAKED THE FUCK OUT AND WANT TO BE AS FAR AWAY FROM HER AS I CAN.

[insanepurin]

Jesus, who would take their 4-5 year old to an occult museum? Think or say the wrong thing, and you'd be Annabelle's victim. D:

I wonder if there's any stories of toys trying to protect their owner from a possessed doll. That'd be neat. :o