The girl on the blog got upset that instead of praising "the savvy move" McCain did, I tore her apart. She only wants people to agree with her when there are comments. If you don't, then her blog isn't your soapbox. (?????)
haha. That so reminds me of Pamela Sue Martin's guesting on SNL and doing the Reaganista lyrics for Jim Belushi's "White Guy Rap": "I'm liberated, I belong to NOW, I voted for Reagan anyhow"
One of the best moments in some very bleak SNL seasons. I wish I could find a clip of it.
Mostly for her children, who did nothing to invite this public scrutiny of their lives.
I was thinking about this more today, and realised it's even worse than just dragging her pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight.
Apparently they've invited the not-so-proud dad-to-be and possibly coerced/threatened husband-to-be to appear with the family at the convention tonight after her speech.
It appears they were initially intent on hiding the pregnancy. Hence all the initial photos of Bristol holding the newest baby to cover up her own. It only came out because of worse rumours about her. This indicates that they probably considered it shameful and embarrassing. Or just politically dangerous. Or maybe just a private matter that didn't need media attention, which would be admirable if I thought it had any remote chance of being true.
But now that it's out, it's not shameful - no, of course not. Now it's pro-life, and they are exploiting their daughter by putting her in the spotlight and making her a poster child for their
( ... )
Comments 9
http://allthingsjennifer.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/hot-damn
The girl on the blog got upset that instead of praising "the savvy move" McCain did, I tore her apart. She only wants people to agree with her when there are comments. If you don't, then her blog isn't your soapbox. (?????)
Reply
this all things jennifer sounds about in line with this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbDHNsaL1g4
(mildly NSFW)
Reply
One of the best moments in some very bleak SNL seasons. I wish I could find a clip of it.
Reply
Reply
I was thinking about this more today, and realised it's even worse than just dragging her pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight.
Apparently they've invited the not-so-proud dad-to-be and possibly coerced/threatened husband-to-be to appear with the family at the convention tonight after her speech.
It appears they were initially intent on hiding the pregnancy. Hence all the initial photos of Bristol holding the newest baby to cover up her own. It only came out because of worse rumours about her. This indicates that they probably considered it shameful and embarrassing. Or just politically dangerous. Or maybe just a private matter that didn't need media attention, which would be admirable if I thought it had any remote chance of being true.
But now that it's out, it's not shameful - no, of course not. Now it's pro-life, and they are exploiting their daughter by putting her in the spotlight and making her a poster child for their ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment