(Untitled)

[hyoue_inugami]

okay, people.

i'm gonna do alittle survery.

i was in a yahoo chat room earlier.

and i got into a heated debate about war.

so.

time to ask a question, who would win, given the same equipment and number of troops and knowladge of weaponry.(we're playing a game of chess)

nepoleon or hitler?

post a comment, along with two sentences stating why.

Comments

[grunyo]

neither. genghis mutha fuckin' KAHN would storm in and win, because HE'D EAT HIS ENEMIES.

:D

[hyoue_inugami]

HAHAHAHAHA.

[musicboy88]

Napolean, because he was a vicious bastard to EVERYONE...
Hitler's a pussy, however, he did FCUK Satan, so, he's not TOO bad

nice one

[lostinchiknland]

hitler would win because he could keep his cool napolean would freak out and then he would be short and spazy spazy people don't win stuff. i would love to see that game i realy would

[fullofmadness]

Hitler, because he was damn good at talking people into things. And he's German, and well all know Germans are just badass.

[hyoue_inugami]

nepoleon, why? he was great with morale.

and a certain some brought quite a few things to my attention, he was a king and his best general, the man had great tact. WAY better than hitler ever could hope.

remember people i said "game of chess" it's all strategy. same pieces.

the only reason he lost at waterloo, is because of the merc who were hired, and he ddn't know he was surrounded.

info via *prettz

[syrens_songs]

Napoleon was an emperor not a king. In the coup d’etat of 1799(not sure?) he and a small regime overthrew the government and created the Consulate (the new regime) with Napoleon as the first Consul, then he made himself Consul for life then finally emperor giving him dictatorial powers.

sorry I'm a geek...