This was an enjoyable read. Thanks for posting it.
The series has always struck me as one about love, loyalty and family - both the one you are born with and the one you collect along the way.
Sometimes love is clear and true, a saturation of the purest hue, but more times than not, the erotic love expressed in Half Blood Prince is downright disturbing.
I think she does a good job of showing both the good and the disturbing sides of most of the forms of love you discussed. I also think the series manages to show how these different forms can blur together or change depending on what is happening between two characters.
Thanks for reading!jazzypomSeptember 11 2006, 17:29:30 UTC
I think she does a good job of showing both the good and the disturbing sides of most of the forms of love you discussed.
Yes, she does. It's definately something that sings of the page, which is why I'm gobsmacked that armarth (sp) dismisses the series outright.
The books aren't really about the magic (although a few witches that I've been acquainted with do praise Rowling's depiction of pratical magic), but its the love that makes the series.
Fair enoughjazzypomSeptember 11 2006, 21:41:00 UTC
I can't fault your argument. In terms of Harry, I'm hesistant to damn him, in the sense that the series is not finished as yet. He's self-centred, true, and certain actions that he's exercised has been questionable, but (I'm loathe to say it), he's a teenage boy that needs to be knocked around somemore
( ... )
FYI--As Leaky Cauldron is reporting, the remarks Rev. Gabriele Amorth supposedly made last week were pulled from an interview he gave in 2001 and included in a recent article as if he had just spoken them
( ... )
To be fair, I've had my concerns re: the Harry Potter series, and my meta over the years has shown that. I do understand a parent's concerns about various things in Harry Potter, and as a minority, I've even expressed concerns with interracial relationships and how they are treated
( ... )
You have some good points here about love being a driving force in the series and the Vatican rather spectacularly missing that point, but I have more than one problem with this analysis. First, I don't believe that it is useful at all to go on ad infinitum about the different types of love in the HP series. JK Rowling has never shown that she cares at all about distinctions between types of love and there is no evidence that this sort of analysis adds anything to understanding the books
( ... )
Comments 26
Reply
Reply
The series has always struck me as one about love, loyalty and family - both the one you are born with and the one you collect along the way.
Sometimes love is clear and true, a saturation of the purest hue, but more times than not, the erotic love expressed in Half Blood Prince is downright disturbing.
I think she does a good job of showing both the good and the disturbing sides of most of the forms of love you discussed. I also think the series manages to show how these different forms can blur together or change depending on what is happening between two characters.
Reply
Yes, she does. It's definately something that sings of the page, which is why I'm gobsmacked that armarth (sp) dismisses the series outright.
The books aren't really about the magic (although a few witches that I've been acquainted with do praise Rowling's depiction of pratical magic), but its the love that makes the series.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
The series started off very catered to children and I think adults find that a difficult adjustment to read from that point of view.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Randall Garrett and Katherine Kurtz have both written fiction in which magic and Christianity co-exist.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment