I think I am experimenting with how and if four (four!) slightly different social-meejah-wossnames can be made to play well together. I note that G+ and parent org appear to be making all the fuckups in the first month that it took LJ a decade to muddle through. That's either something clever to do with the accelerating nature of the 'plug-in
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
Reply
G+ is not a social network. it's the aisle I shops for bras in.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I love the way that you imply there's a single, agreed-upon opinion :-)
If you feel strongly, please use the feedback button. Things *will* change if people request it.
Reply
There is probably more to the 'Gurgle deleted my account and I don't know why' story, if only because the complaint on Twitlonger uses words and phrases I see when people complain about being booted off $employer's website(s) for T&C and/or local policy violations.
However, from the outside, yr splendid employers do jolly fine impersonations of a monolithic org. It's going to be different from the inside, no doubt. F'rinstance I don't know what HP looked like from the outside, but inside was a right cockney barrel of monkeys.
On the anon/pseudo argument, I don't know where I fall yet. As noted before, the drama-magnets will manage to exploit either position for maximal Accident. Still, I have a 'just fuck off will you' circle (Although it should probably be called 'Eight' or 'Bolgia-2' were I some sort of classicist) so that's, um, crab with brass hand.
Reply
Reply
(Says the chap with a name that blows up airline reservation systems, and there was some pisspot socially-socially site that threw a fit over the hyphen, which, while I'm prepared to forgive systems coded in the sixties when no-one had names like, I don't know, Alec Douglas-Home or Norman St. John-Stevas (nb: sarcasm) anything more recent that, oh, 1998 is on rather a sticky wicket.)
Now I have read this I am in favour of psuedonyms. Still not convinced about anonymity, mind.
Reply
Leave a comment