The last time I had to strip, clean and re-assemble an IBM keyboard, it was the mid 80s, the thing had probably come off an XT from Rolls-Royce at Filton that someone had poured their cocoa into, and I was the PFY
( Read more... )
I would just like to take this opportunity to point out that in an effort to create the new discipline of Method Writing, I wrote my 8-bit cyberpunk novel almost entirely on a piece of IBM artillery that just happened to have buckling springs and keycaps and stuff.
I am, at the moment, only half-way pondering whether or not I want to create laser-engraved, inlaid copper keycaps for this bizarro linux laptop I'm making.
I have, on the other hand, already ordered the copper cladding for the case, the labradorite gems for the power switch (two in case one is insufficiently translucent for the LED) and tomorrow will purchase the oxblood-red leather.
I'll indulge in a moment's nostalgia for Tandberg keyboards that made this IBM look flimsy. Hall effect switches they had too.
We had to replace them every now and then for $HOW_MUCH a pop, after scrotes cut them off with (presumably) some vain hope of interfacing them with their speccies and shit.
I am minded to construct an poll about this sort of thing, because it's only now that the IBM seems exceptional.
Although I guess if I wanted exceptional, it would be the early Compaq keyboards where the switches were squidgy foam with silver paper glued to the business end. Exceptionally horrible.
The key thing, so to speak was that the early IBM computer keyboards (we will skip lightly over the electromechanical abortions on the 029 keypunches) were designed and laid out by the ergonomics people who made the Selectric typewriters which were the creme de la creme of typing engines at the time. That's why, for example, the keytops were dished and the rows sloped upwards in a curve rather than being a flat harsh plane of buttons as most keyboards had been up till then (see the Commodore PET for a horrifying counterexample).
Yes. The original PET (2001?) was horrible, but by the time of the, um, 3032, things were less worse.
Then again, there was the MZ80K.
And then again one's off into odd industrial design with stuff like TVI terminals. I vaguely remember a slew of similarly-aged kit where the keyboards were just uniformly grotty, if only because of the nicotine stains.
If said keyboard is a Model M type thing then popping it in a dishwasher on the "delicates" cycle should do the trick. A friend acquired a huge pile of IBM workstations about 10 years ago from a uni clearout. The machines were scrap but the keyboards, cleaned in the dishwasher and then dried, got sold for a reasonable amount to discerning students. I still have mine, connected to my main PC.
Comments 19
Reply
Mind, I suspect your choice would be more use for making stroppy coders see sense.
Reply
Which would break first?
Reply
I am, at the moment, only half-way pondering whether or not I want to create laser-engraved, inlaid copper keycaps for this bizarro linux laptop I'm making.
I have, on the other hand, already ordered the copper cladding for the case, the labradorite gems for the power switch (two in case one is insufficiently translucent for the LED) and tomorrow will purchase the oxblood-red leather.
There will be pictures.
Reply
(http://jarkman.co.uk/catalog/jewel/brassqrcodes.htm)
Reply
Reply
Reply
We had to replace them every now and then for $HOW_MUCH a pop, after scrotes cut them off with (presumably) some vain hope of interfacing them with their speccies and shit.
Reply
Although I guess if I wanted exceptional, it would be the early Compaq keyboards where the switches were squidgy foam with silver paper glued to the business end. Exceptionally horrible.
Reply
Reply
Then again, there was the MZ80K.
And then again one's off into odd industrial design with stuff like TVI terminals. I vaguely remember a slew of similarly-aged kit where the keyboards were just uniformly grotty, if only because of the nicotine stains.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment