Lomography.(Contains shoddy negative cutting, poor-quality scans, persons who may recognise themselves and thus never speak to me again where that would be bad, socialist-unrealist landscapes, LC-A behaviour from the XA2, demonstrations of camera-lobbing, persons who may recognise themselves and thus never speak to me again where I would be quite
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Thank you.
(Mind if I try to icon-ise it?)
Reply
On one hand, it's objectifying someone. On the other, I think it's a strangely powerful and kinetic image.
Please, icon-furtle away
Reply
Reply
I guess it's a reaction to the majority of the Whitby photography that happens. A set of it is standard fetish/modelling - most people involved seem happy with that. Another set is flash-photographed drunk people having a red-eyed laugh - again, most people involved seem happy with that.
I've been at the photographed end of both types and it's not something I'm keen on. (I need to expand on this because it leads off in a direction that's not strictly true, and People Who Model may read this and begin to think I'm bagging on them, which would be a particularly incorrect conclusion to leap in a single bound.)
Reply
Leave a comment