Okay so this started over at HUCHAT. Someone asked us all a question. They were wondering how the different houses would respond. Now the question is NSFW so it's behind the lj-cut for convenience. You can also read it on reddit.
Convince the peer not to pee on me, but say he did, as the benefactor requires no form of proof, and we would both benefit from the exchange. Should he refuse or threaten to snitch, I'd kidnap his dog. ^_^
I would refuse to participate in either scenario simply to deprive the anonymous billionaire of his ridiculous power trip. I realize he could easily find other participants, but the whole thing would make me so angry that I personally couldn't endure it.
Additional question: In your opinion, does this billionaire qualify as a "job creator?"
I'm going to present my response in pictures because I so ardently refuse to really truly engage with this disgusting concept (there are honest, clean ways to come by money). It's the most reddit thing ever and as someone who got the heck out of that place, things like this make me not miss it one iota.
Comments 40
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I would refuse to participate in either scenario simply to deprive the anonymous billionaire of his ridiculous power trip. I realize he could easily find other participants, but the whole thing would make me so angry that I personally couldn't endure it.
Additional question: In your opinion, does this billionaire qualify as a "job creator?"
Reply
I suppose so? Not in the eyes of the law though b/c it's $300 tax-free?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Learn more about LiveJournal Ratings in FAQ.
Reply
Reply
Reply
IT WAS GENUINE.
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment