Comments | hidden_kitten: (без темы)

hidden_kitten

(Untitled)

Feb 01, 2007 22:37

Animal testing. Why, when there are 6 000 000 000 humans who will actually be using the product? If you want to know if a shampoo will or won't burn a human's hair off, why wouldn't you test it on a human you've paid? Fact: if penicillin was tested on guinea pigs, we wouldn't have it, as they are deathly allergic to it ( Read more... )

craziness, rants

Comments 3

(The comment has been removed)

hidden_kitten February 2 2007, 04:39:12 UTC

And rats are such sweeties, too. We have one at work that's just AWESOME and we all love him to pieces. He likes to stick his nose in my ear and chill on my chest.

dragoonsoul February 2 2007, 04:48:54 UTC

The possible deadly reaction to humans is why they don't do it. Personally, I think they should use it as a work-release program for criminals.

hidden_kitten February 2 2007, 14:29:07 UTC

Hmmmm, you're very right. You know, prisons are just underrated laboratory sites! This is why I need you around: to pick my brain for better ideas.