Ecumenical Advent Sunday 4: Grace Episcopal

Dec 18, 2005 20:57

[Advent day 22] Jeremiah 23:5-6 5 "The days are coming," declares the LORD,
      "when I will raise up to David [Or  up from David's line] a righteous Branch,
      a King who will reign wisely
      and do what is just and right in the land.

6 In his days Judah will be saved ( Read more... )

faith journey, holidays: christmas, church: ecumenical advent: 2005, advent daily readings 2005, church: norwood: grace episcopal, links

Leave a comment

Comments 16

hedy December 19 2005, 02:03:49 UTC
I'm finding what you're saying about Christianity interesting.

Reply

hermionesviolin December 19 2005, 03:21:59 UTC
Thanks. I'm always glad to hear other people find my meanderings interesting.

Reply


sk8eeyore December 19 2005, 05:33:59 UTC
We claim to be both Catholic - that is, true to the ancient Christian faith - and Protestant - truly reformed. I'm having a bit of a hard time swallowing this about the Anglican Communion in general, I have to admit. Was it really Catholic, not catholic? The latter I get, but...

We have no required confession of Faith, except the Apostles' Creed and Nicene Creed, 'Except' the Creeds? Um, those ARE confessions of faith...and pretty darn big ones!!!

However, if you have a cold or other communicable illness and prefer to intinct (that is, dip the bread in the wine), a small intinction cup is provided for that purpose. *thinks back to what Prof. Spinks said to us about how intinction is actually germier than using the shared cup--though I guess if they have a separate cup for that purpose, it isn't so bad.*

list hymnal page numbers in the bulletin but for some reason the hymnal doesn't give hymn titles Yeah, I dislike that about the Episcopal hymnal. Among other things, such as the fact I rarely recognize or like the hymns.

... )

Reply

hermionesviolin December 20 2005, 01:44:48 UTC
> > We claim to be both Catholic - that is, true to the ancient Christian faith - and Protestant - truly reformed ( ... )

Reply

sk8eeyore December 20 2005, 16:31:27 UTC
At St. John's people kneel quite a bit-- during the penitential order throughout Advent, always during the Prayers of the People, during much of the Eucharistic prayer (though some choose to stand during this), while receiving Communion, and often during the post-Communion prayer. I like that the bulletin says something like, "During the parts of the service marked with a 'K' you're welcome to kneel OR stand; and sitting is always acceptable."

Reply

hermionesviolin December 21 2005, 02:08:02 UTC
When people went up to get Communion they knelt. I didn't see if people were kneeling when they returned to their seats.

Under "Sanctus" it said, "The people stand or kneel," and I considered standing, but no one else was, so I just sat.

Reply


rebekahroxanna December 19 2005, 13:36:40 UTC
I hope you will feel comfortable in your doubt. The texts are contradictory and some are awfully problematic (the Psalm which celebrates the smashing of babies' heads comes to mind). For me, Christianity is not about Truth. Christianity is a way of living one's life, of believing that Jesus taught us how to be fully human. The texts are, for me, not ETERNAL TRUTH, but stories of how humans struggled to live in conformity with God's wishes for their lives and usually how they failed, were forgiven, learned and continued.

For me worship is an opportunity to be in community and to meet the Holy.

Brueggemann is a hero of mine, though I haven't managed to plow through any of his stuff

Merry Christmas

Reply

hermionesviolin December 20 2005, 02:26:56 UTC
(Hello, stranger. And welcome.)

I don't think I could ever feel truly comfortable in real doubt (though obviously I'm open to the possibility of being wrong on something so unknowable as this, and I do believe in an Omniscient Omnipotent Omnibenevolent Creator, so I expect to find out the Truth after death) so since so many people do believe in the divinity and resurrection of Jesus I expect I'll go back to the research until I make up my own mind one way or the other.

You articulate an interesting way of looking at Jesus and the Judeo-Christian tradition which is in many ways appealling to me, so I'll definitely be thinking about that. Thank you.

I can't remember if we read any Brueggemann before the lecture, but I certainly feel like the talk he gave was my introduction to him, and I don't think he will ever recover from that in my estimation. Though I'm willing to try out other writings of his if recommended to me.

Reply

rebekahroxanna December 20 2005, 12:48:45 UTC
Thanks, you are on one of my friends fl. Probably several since I have heard your name more than once. I'm loosely connected with some ATPOers ( ... )

Reply

hermionesviolin December 22 2005, 15:13:03 UTC
If you are interested in textual problems, Bart Erhmanns has a new book, "Misquoting Jesus" Erhmanns is a professor of religion at UNC-Chapel Hill. It is very good; a little repetititive.

Thanks for the recommendation. I'll definitely add it to my list as I am very interested in textual problems.

I know the New Testament authors were writing from different perspectives and for different audiences, though it is a good point for me to be reminded of. My issue with Biblical contradictions is usually between the NT and the OT rather than within the NT itself, though I do want to do further research into what Jesus is reported as having said and what people extrapolated from that later (Paul's letters, Church tradition, etc.).

After struggling with evil, i no longer buy into omnipotence, but that is a much longer discussion.

Yeah, it's definitely a difficult issue, with no easy answers.

The bottom line for me is that God is ultimately mystery.

True.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up