I saw Pacific Rim yesterday. It was the first contemporary big-action, humans-versus-aliens I've seen, and I found it enormously interesting, but it also left me with much to think about.
I really loved its look, which seemed to me in places to owe a lot to Blade Runner, by the way. But then again, I was told by my learned companion that the film
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
The Wei triplets are like my big "You were so great, why not more of you, we were in HONG KONG." I'd argue that Stacker doesn't fit the Magical Negro trope (hadn't heard of that one before!), but PR isn't really that great about race in several spots. (Name of the main characters' Jaeger, anyone?)
Okay, I'm just going to link-spam now. Some of it's just for laughs and some of it's analysis. I spend lots of time on tumblr, okay?
http://likethewaterfilter.tumblr.com/post/55839060431/errorofyourways-his-welding-goggles-dirt
http://gingerhaze.tumblr.com/post/55522636994
http://soyonscruels.tumblr.com/post/57000194513/witchpriest-ok-the-pacific-rim-class-post-we
( ... )
Reply
I liked the welding goggles tip-off! And it's part of the whole attention to detail that ends up as the visual strength of the film (by and large, i.e. there's bits where it falters, I think).
And the part about the empty mind and the drift - yes... I can see that, and good point, though I still think it leaves him as the magic saviour, like... he could have spent a bit of time sharing this technique, not being the only person who does it. But no, because he's special and magic, and, not coincidentally, the only black person in the whole film with a speaking part (or a name).
Which brings us to the link about the racial biases, and yes, emphatically agreed. (Though I snickered at the bit saying "with major heroic characters hailing from the USA? Western Europe? and freakin’ Australia?" as if that last was just too outrageously out of place. They weren't Australians anyway, they were just grabbed by a lazy scriptwriter from the nearest stereotype bucket.) It was one of the huger ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment