I have had way more than my share of sick this year. I'm recovering now from my third bout being down with some kind of cold or flu. At least this one is not as wretched as the fever-and-lung-pain thing I had in January. And I thought I had escaped the plague of PCon.
So I'm at home and have been doing some further readings on the Faery researches
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
On the subject of how we might think of Hell here, it occurs to me that Lon DuQuette says that the medæval magickian's experience of the gœtic demons as “creatures of Hell” can be read as an exteriorization of the unbalanced forces in one's own Self, which in their church cosmology of course had to manifest as big monsters from the Devil's underground theme park. (Note the ambiguous extent of the Self in this description: Mr DuQuette would say that it really is all in your head ... but your head is a lot bigger than you think it is.) Once one has learned to bring those demons into your service, this is greatly empowering. Like Mr DuQuette, I would say that we can think of these personal demons in a commonplace psychological sense if we wish, but We Who Are Wise In The Art prefer to admit that the forces in place are rather bigger than that. He describes how in his own gœtic ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Aye. To this point, I was just saying to panshiva the other day:The cosmos is so constructed that the effects of magickal practice will always be explainable as only a change in the practitioner's psyche. Early in magickal practice, though surprising things happen to the practitioner this psychological explanation is far simpler and tidier than believing in spooky æthers, deities, energies, and so forth. As the practitioner continues to work, explaining events in purely psychological terms requires increasingly elaborate justification ... until eventually one realizes that those “spooky” explanations are actually simpler.
More specifically to the question of where this “Hell” place really is, there's the way I understand the tradition in qabalah to say that the Tree of Life is both a map of the Cosmos and a map of the Self. It can be both because each element of the Self-each element of the mind, in the greatest sense of mind-is the way we make contact with that element of the Cosmos. When I get all ( ... )
Reply
And actually, now that I say that, I find it easier to grasp where Hell is in the Cosmos than where Færie is!
We are amused. Also, the opposite is true of me ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment