People who argue are often criticized by people who "don't argue," since it is obvious that people who argue are just wasting their time
( Read more... )
"The whole point:" !?! you mean to say that your and only your point consists of the "whole" and total arguments that could be created in the concieveable universe? there is no other point? all points will, at some point, lead back to or otherwise include your point inorder to consititute the whole? clever strategy. since any opponent would have a slightly dissimilar point their point couldnt "be" as "whole" as your agrument, therefore forcing the opponent to spew a "fractured point" or, in the vernaular, part of a point.
Actually, Hollis, it was more a matter of word usage. By "whole point" I am referring to the main assesment I am trying to display to the reader of the article. This is what I was describing there, not the whole and complete idea behind the universe. Although, I would like to be explaining that to someone some day, I do not know it, and I doubt I ever will.
Comments 9
not ok, war
+hOLLIS
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
let's go get some heidi's pies.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment